US5357976A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of and arrangement for diagnosing brain disease
Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1992-12-21
•
Granted: 1994-10-25
•
Expires: 2012-12-21
Abstract
Abstract Brain disease is non-invasively, accurately diagnosed at an early stage. A plurality of functions descriptive of the patient are mathematically determined. A set of indices for each function is established in advance. Each index has two states indicative of the patient's condition. An integrated pattern of the states of the indices from a plurality of the functions is generated and matched against a stored collection of index patterns whose diagnosis is known.
Inventors
- 👤 Genquan Feng
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-22 23:18
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61B; A61B5/00; A61B5/24; A61B5/30; A61B5/307; A61B5/31; A61B5/308
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 19
Claim 1
Independent Claim
138 words
A method of diagnosing a brain condition of a patient, comprising the steps of: (a) acquiring electrocardiographic signals from the patient; (b) mathematically determining a plurality of functions descriptive of the patient from the electroencephalographic signals; (c) establishing a set of indices for each function, each index having two states, each indicative of the brain condition of the patient; (d) recognizing the state of each index for each function; (e) generating an integrated pattern of the states of the indices from a plurality of the functions; (f) storing a collection of index patterns, each containing a multitude of patterns of the states of indices for a multitude of patients whose brain condition is known; and (g) matching the generated integrated pattern against the stored collection of index patterns to determine the brain condition of the patient being diagnosed.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
138 words
A method of diagnosing a brain condition of a patient, comprising the steps of: (a) acquiring electrocardiographic signals from the patient; (b) mathematically determining a plurality of functions descriptive of the patient from the electroencephalographic signals; (c) establishing a set of indices for each function, each index having two states, each indicative of the brain condition of the patient; (d) recognizing the state of each index for each function; (e) generating an integrated pattern of the states of the indices from a plurality of the functions; (f) storing a collection of index patterns, each containing a multitude of patterns of the states of indices for a multitude of patients whose brain condition is known; and (g) matching the generated integrated pattern against the stored collection of index patterns to determine the brain condition of the patient being diagnosed.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
46 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein the acquiring step is performed by acquiring the electroencephalographic signals as a function of time from a surface of the skull of the patient being diagnosed through a plurality of skull surface eletroencephalo electrodes over a multicycle test period.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method according to claim 2, wherein the acquiring step is performed by processing the electroencephalographic signals into analog signals that are indicative of the brain activity at the right and left frontal areas of the brain.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method according to claim 2, wherein the mathematically determining step is performed by converting the electroencephalographic time-dependent signals into respective power spectrum characteristics wherein power is a function of frequency.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
62 words
The method according to claim 4, wherein the establishing step is performed by setting in advance pre-set parameters, including location, amplitude and width of highest peak; and wherein the recognizing step is performed by comparing each power spectrum characteristic against the pre-set parameters, and by determining the state of each index for each power spectrum characteristic in response to the comparing step.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method according to claim 2, wherein the mathematically determining step is performed by converting the electroencephalographic time-dependent signals into an amplitude ratio of a transfer function characteristic wherein transfer function is a function of frequency.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
67 words
The method according to claim 6, wherein the establishing step is performed by setting in advance pre-set parameters, including amplitude differences between peaks, and amplitude of the characteristic within a range; and wherein the recognizing step is performed by comparing the transfer function characteristic against the pre-set parameters, and by determining the state of each index for the transfer function characteristic in response to the comparing step.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method according to claim 7, wherein the mathematically determining step is performed by converting the electroencephalographic time-dependent signals into a coherence characteristic wherein coherence between the electroencephalographic signals is a function of frequency.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
60 words
The method according to claim 8, wherein the establishing step is performed by setting in advance pre-set parameters, including amplitude of individual peaks within a range; and wherein the recognizing step is performed by comparing the coherence characteristic against the pre-set parameters, and by determining the state of each index for the coherence characteristic in response to the comparing step.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method according to claim 2, wherein the mathematically determining step is performed by converting the electroencephalographic time-dependent signals into an impulse response characteristic wherein amplitude is a function of impulse time.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
80 words
The method according to claim 10, wherein the establishing step is performed by setting in advance pre-set parameters, including the times of peaks and valleys in the characteristic, amplitude differences of the peaks and valleys, and the amplitude and shape of the main peak; and wherein the recognizing step is performed by comparing the impulse response characteristic against the pre-set parameters, and by determining the state of each index for the impulse response characteristic in response to the comparing step.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method according to claim 2, wherein the mathematically determining step is performed by converting the electroencephalographic time-dependent signals into amplitude histogram characteristics wherein occurrence frequency is a function of amplitude.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
68 words
The method according to claim 12, wherein the establishing step is performed by setting in advance pre-set parameters, including the ratio between the occurrence frequency and the maximum amplitude of each characteristic; and wherein the recognizing step is performed by comparing each amplitude histogram characteristic against the pre-set parameters, and by determining the state of each index for each amplitude histogram characteristic in response to the comparing step.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method according to claim 11, wherein the generating step is performed by generating the integrated pattern from all of said functions.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
327 words
A method of diagnosing a brain condition of a patient, comprising the steps (a) acquiring electrical analog electroencephalographic signals from the patient; (b) mathematically determining a plurality of functions descriptive of the sample from the analog signals, including power spectrum, transfer function, impulse response, cross correlation and coherence; (c) establishing a set of indices fof each function, each index having two states, each indicative of the condition of the patient; (d) recognizing the state of each index for each function; (e) generating an integrated pattern of the states of the indices from a plurality of the functions; (f) storing a collection of index patterns, each containing a multitude of patterns of the states of indices for a multitude of patients whose condition is known; (g) matching the generated integrated pattern against the stored collection of index patterns to determine the brain condition of the patient; and (h) said establishing step including: (1) HW--Is the highest peak of the power spectrum in the delta band above a limit as well as too wide? (2) OH--Is the highest peak of the power spectrum in the theta band above a limit? (3) As---Is the main peak of the power spectrum of the alpha wave shifted to the theta band? (4) As+--Is the main peak of the power spectrum of the alpha wave shifted to the beta band? (5) EV--Is the transfer function curve too even in the low frequency range? (6) RC--Is the highest peak of the coherence in the theta band higher than that in the alpha band? (7) RT--Is the highest peak of the transfer function in the theta band higher than that in the alpha band? (8) PA--Does the shape of the phase angle wave resemble the letter "W"? (9) LF--Is there a late fluctuation of the impulse response? (10) L3--Is there a delay of the third peak of the impulse response? (11) F/A--Is the ratio of the occurrence frequency/amplitude of the amplitude histogram above a limit?
Claim 17
Independent Claim
327 words
A method of diagnosing a brain condition of a patient, comprising the steps (a) acquiring electrical analog electroencephalographic signals from the patient; (b) mathematically determining a plurality of functions descriptive of the sample from the analog signals, including power spectrum, transfer function, impulse response, cross correlation and coherence; (c) establishing a set of indices fof each function, each index having two states, each indicative of the condition of the patient; (d) recognizing the state of each index for each function; (e) generating an integrated pattern of the states of the indices from a plurality of the functions; (f) storing a collection of index patterns, each containing a multitude of patterns of the states of indices for a multitude of patients whose condition is known; (g) matching the generated integrated pattern against the stored collection of index patterns to determine the brain condition of the patient; and (h) said establishing step including: (1) HW--Is the highest peak of the power spectrum in the delta band above a limit as well as too wide? (2) OH--Is the highest peak of the power spectrum in the theta band above a limit? (3) As---Is the main peak of the power spectrum of the alpha wave shifted to the theta band? (4) As+--Is the main peak of the power spectrum of the alpha wave shifted to the beta band? (5) EV--Is the transfer function curve too even in the low frequency range? (6) RC--Is the highest peak of the coherence in the theta band higher than that in the alpha band? (7) RT--Is the highest peak of the transfer function in the theta band higher than that in the alpha band? (8) PA--Does the shape of the phase angle wave resemble the letter "W"? (9) LF--Is there a late fluctuation of the impulse response? (10) L3--Is there a delay of the third peak of the impulse response? (11) F/A--Is the ratio of the occurrence frequency/amplitude of the amplitude histogram above a limit?
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
149 words
An arrangement for diagnosing a brain condition of a patient, comprising: (a) means for acquiring electroencephalographic signals from the patient; (b) means for mathematically determining a plurality of functions descriptive of the patient from the electroencephalographic signals; (c) means for establishing a set of indices for each function, each index having two states, each indicative of the brain condition of the patient; (d) means for recognizing the state of each index for each function; (e) means for generating an integrated pattern of the states of the indices from a plurality of the functions; (f) means for storing a collection of index patterns, each containing a multitude of patterns of the states of indices for a multitude of patients whose brain condition is known; and (g) means for matching the generated integrated pattern against the stored collection of index patterns to determin the brain condition of the patient being diagnosed.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
149 words
An arrangement for diagnosing a brain condition of a patient, comprising: (a) means for acquiring electroencephalographic signals from the patient; (b) means for mathematically determining a plurality of functions descriptive of the patient from the electroencephalographic signals; (c) means for establishing a set of indices for each function, each index having two states, each indicative of the brain condition of the patient; (d) means for recognizing the state of each index for each function; (e) means for generating an integrated pattern of the states of the indices from a plurality of the functions; (f) means for storing a collection of index patterns, each containing a multitude of patterns of the states of indices for a multitude of patients whose brain condition is known; and (g) means for matching the generated integrated pattern against the stored collection of index patterns to determin the brain condition of the patient being diagnosed.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4201224A
Cited
US4545388A
Cited
US4832480A
Cited
US4815474A
Cited
US4907597A
Cited
US5083571A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1997-10-24 | 1998-04-25 | 1998-10-25 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2001-10-24 | 2002-04-25 | 2002-10-25 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2005-10-24 | 2006-04-25 | 2006-10-25 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |