US4201224A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Electroencephalographic method and system for the quantitative description of patient brain states
Assignee: New York University
•
Filing: 1978-12-29
•
Granted: 1980-05-06
•
Expires: 1998-12-29
Abstract
Abstract A method and system for the quantitative description of human abnormal brain states, for example, to distinguish cerebral death from a barbiturate induced deep coma, includes an electroencephalograph (EEG) system utilizing scalp electrodes and amplifiers. A computer based system controls a multimodal stimulator (clicks, flashes, etc.) to provide evoked response data for different sensory systems. The ongoing EEG and averaged response data are processed quantitatively and compared with previously stored normative data, describing brain states in patients free of head trauma, to calculate a set of Z-transformations. The Z-transformations define Z, the brain state vector (BSV), which may be visually displayed. The length, direction and change of BSV over time provide an evaluation of the anatomical location of any damage, the severity of functional impairment and the rate of improvement or deterioration of the patient's state in order to aid in selection and guidance of treatment.
Inventors
- 👤 E. Roy John
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-22 23:17
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61B; A61B5/00; A61B5/24; A61B5/316; A61B5/369; A61B5/372; A61B5/374; A61B5/377; A61B5/383; A61B5/384; A61B5/40; A61B5/4076; A61B5/68; A61B5/6801; A61B5/6843
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 25
Claim 1
Independent Claim
225 words
The method of determining the brain state of a patient including the steps of: (a) attaching a plurality of electrodes to the scalp of a comatose patient or a patient with other brain dysfunctions to detect the patient's brainwaves in the form of electroencephalographic (EEG) and evoked response (EP) data; (b) amplifying the electrical signals detected at each electrode; (c) using a programmed computer based system as the control for stimulating the patient with a series of multi-sensory stimulations to elicit evoked responses from cortex and brain stem; (d) obtaining and analyzing on-line digital EEG or EP data by connecting analog-digital converters to each amplifier, and digitizing all data as it is gathered; (e) obtaining sets of on-going EEG and average evoked response data for the patient and using said computer based system to extract diagnostically useful features from such sets of data, and automatic construction of a Z-transform for each such feature based upon a comparison with stored normative data obtained by computing mean values and standard deviations for each feature from groups of subjects or patients without head trauma or brain dysfunction; (f) computing a state vector for the patient comprising a vector sum based upon those Z-transformed features which are significantly deviant from normative values; and (g) visually displaying the length (severity), orientation (quality) and change with time of said state vector.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
225 words
The method of determining the brain state of a patient including the steps of: (a) attaching a plurality of electrodes to the scalp of a comatose patient or a patient with other brain dysfunctions to detect the patient's brainwaves in the form of electroencephalographic (EEG) and evoked response (EP) data; (b) amplifying the electrical signals detected at each electrode; (c) using a programmed computer based system as the control for stimulating the patient with a series of multi-sensory stimulations to elicit evoked responses from cortex and brain stem; (d) obtaining and analyzing on-line digital EEG or EP data by connecting analog-digital converters to each amplifier, and digitizing all data as it is gathered; (e) obtaining sets of on-going EEG and average evoked response data for the patient and using said computer based system to extract diagnostically useful features from such sets of data, and automatic construction of a Z-transform for each such feature based upon a comparison with stored normative data obtained by computing mean values and standard deviations for each feature from groups of subjects or patients without head trauma or brain dysfunction; (f) computing a state vector for the patient comprising a vector sum based upon those Z-transformed features which are significantly deviant from normative values; and (g) visually displaying the length (severity), orientation (quality) and change with time of said state vector.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method of determining the brain state of claim 1 wherein after the step of digitizing all data as it is gathered the digitized data is examined in a buffer to automatically reject that data which is contaminated by artifacts and then storing the valid (artifact free) data.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of determining brain state of claim 2 wherein said data are reduced by a spectral analysis of spontaneous EEG and computation of average evoked responses to each type of stimulus.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of determining brain state of claim 1 wherein said state vector is selected from the group consisting of the brain state vector (BSV), the cortex state vector, the thalamus state vector and the brain stem state vector.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method of determining brain state of claim 1 and including EKG artifact reduction due to scalp EKG by the steps of testing, using the "t" test, the spectral analysis of features from each electrode against the simultaneously measured and similarly computed data from a scalp EKG electrode.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method of determining brain state of claim 5 and including the step, after such EKG artifact reduction, of using the "t" test to compare the data of the features obtained free of scalp EKG with the corresponding measures of environment noise samples.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of determining brain state of claim 6 wherein said method is used to test patients whose level of barbituration may be to the depth of their showing an isopotential EEG by visual inspection.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of determining brain state of claim 1 and including the step of automatically, under programmed control, switching EEG electrodes from the amplifier inputs to dummy loads to obtain measures of environmental noise.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of determining brain state of claim 1 wherein the electrodes are internal to bands and the bands are stretched over the patient's head and an earclip electrode is connected to the patient's earlobe.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of determining brain state of claim 1 and the additional steps of automatically, under control of said computer system, regularly testing the impedance of the electrodes to determine if the impedance at each electrode is within predetermined acceptable limits.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of determining brain state of claim 1 wherein the stimuli presented to the patient includes, at random intervals, auditory clicks delivered through earphones on the patient and light flashes and somatosensory stimulus.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of determining brain state of claim 11 wherein the somatosensory stimuli are electrical shock pulses delivered through electrodes removably attached to the patient's wrists or ankles.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of determining brain state of claim 1 and including the further step of halting the collection of patient EEG data during muscle artifact.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of determining brain state of claim 1 wherein said visual display is on a cathode ray tube (CRT).
Claim 16
Independent Claim
204 words
A system for determining the brain state of a patient including: (a) a plurality of electrodes adapted to be attached to the scalp of a comatose patient or a patient with other brain dysfunctions to detect the patient's brainwaves in the form of electroencephalograph (EEG) and evoked response (EP) data; (b) preamplifiers; (c) a stimulator means for stimulating the patient in a series of multi-sensory stimulations and stimulations of separate modalities to elicit evoked responses; (d) a programmed computer based system means for the control of said stimulator means, including the use of microprocessors for such purposes; (e) analog-digital converter means connected to said amplifier means for obtaining on-line digital EEG and EP data; (f) means for obtaining sets of on-going EEG and average evoked response data for the patient and automatically constructing a Z-transform for each analytic measure extracted from such sets of data based upon a comparison with normative data from groups of patients without head trauma or other brain dysfunctions; (g) means for computing a state vector for the patient comprising a vector sum based upon those Z-transformed features significantly deviant from the normative data; and (h) means for visually displaying the length and change of time of said state vector.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
204 words
A system for determining the brain state of a patient including: (a) a plurality of electrodes adapted to be attached to the scalp of a comatose patient or a patient with other brain dysfunctions to detect the patient's brainwaves in the form of electroencephalograph (EEG) and evoked response (EP) data; (b) preamplifiers; (c) a stimulator means for stimulating the patient in a series of multi-sensory stimulations and stimulations of separate modalities to elicit evoked responses; (d) a programmed computer based system means for the control of said stimulator means, including the use of microprocessors for such purposes; (e) analog-digital converter means connected to said amplifier means for obtaining on-line digital EEG and EP data; (f) means for obtaining sets of on-going EEG and average evoked response data for the patient and automatically constructing a Z-transform for each analytic measure extracted from such sets of data based upon a comparison with normative data from groups of patients without head trauma or other brain dysfunctions; (g) means for computing a state vector for the patient comprising a vector sum based upon those Z-transformed features significantly deviant from the normative data; and (h) means for visually displaying the length and change of time of said state vector.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
33 words
The system for determining brain state of claim 15 wherein said preamplifiers include FETs (field effect transistors) positioned closely adjacent said electrodes to reduce artifact pickup by providing a low impedance signal amplifier.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
37 words
The system for determining brain state of claim 15 and further including means photically coupled to said amplifiers to permit said amplification with total safety even in the complex electrical environment of a hospital intensive care unit.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
54 words
The system for determining brain state of claim 15 and further including switching means to switch said system and its display means from the display of the brain state vector (BSV) for the whole brain to the display of particular anatomical regions selected from the group of the cortex, thalamus and brain stem regions.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
41 words
The system of determining brain state of claim 15 and further including bands which are stretched over the patient's head and an earclip electrode which is connected to the patient's earlobe, wherein the said electrodes are internal to the said bands.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
39 words
The system of determining brain state of claim 15 and means for automatically, under control of said computer system, regularly testing the impedance of the electrodes to determine if the impedance at each electrode is within predetermined acceptable limits.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
33 words
The system of determining brain state of claim 15 wherein the stimulator means includes means for presenting, at random intervals, auditory clicks delivered through earphones and light flashes and somatosensory slight electrical shocks.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
28 words
The system of determining brain state of claim 15 wherein the somatosensory stimulus are electrical shock pulses delivered through electrodes removably attached to the patient's wrists or ankles.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
20 words
The system of determining brain state of claim 15 wherein said visual display is on a cathode ray tube (CRT).
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1983-05-06 | 1983-11-05 | 1984-05-06 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1987-05-06 | 1987-11-05 | 1988-05-06 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1991-05-06 | 1991-11-05 | 1992-05-06 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |