US5032243A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method and apparatus for forming or modifying cutting edges
Assignee: Gillette Co LLC
•
Filing: 1989-09-06
•
Granted: 1991-07-16
•
Expires: 2009-09-06
Abstract
Abstract A method of forming or modifying the cutting edges of razor blades, and apparatus for carrying out the method. The method comprises subjecting a stack of razor blades (12) to ion bombardment from two ion sources (13, 14) in a vacuum chamber (10), the ion sources being located on opposite sides of a plane (15) which lies within the stack and parallel to the major surfaces of the blades and the ion sources having the axes of their ion beams directed at the edges of the razor blades in the stack.
Inventors
- 👤 Roger J. Bache
- 👤 Colin F. Parker
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 09:06
CPC Classifications
C; C23; C23C; C23C14/00; C23C14/22; C23C14/225; C23C14/02; C23C14/021; C23C14/022; C23F; C23F4/00
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim
128 words
A method of forming or modifying the cutting edges of razor blades, which comprises subjecting a stack of razor blades to ion bombardment from two ion sources in a vacuum chamber, the ion sources being located on opposite sides of a plane which lies within the stack and parallel to the major surfaces of the blades and the ion sources having the axes of their ion beams directed at the edges of the razor blades in the stack and the ion bombardment being effected with ions of sufficient mass and energy, in relation to the material of which the razor blades are formed, to cause sputter removal of the material of the blades on both sides of the edges thereof to thereby form or modify their cutting edges.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
128 words
A method of forming or modifying the cutting edges of razor blades, which comprises subjecting a stack of razor blades to ion bombardment from two ion sources in a vacuum chamber, the ion sources being located on opposite sides of a plane which lies within the stack and parallel to the major surfaces of the blades and the ion sources having the axes of their ion beams directed at the edges of the razor blades in the stack and the ion bombardment being effected with ions of sufficient mass and energy, in relation to the material of which the razor blades are formed, to cause sputter removal of the material of the blades on both sides of the edges thereof to thereby form or modify their cutting edges.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
67 words
A method according to claim 1, in which the ion bombardment is operated to provide cutting edges in which: w≦ad.sup.n in which w is the tip width, in μm, of the cutting edge at a distance d, in μm, from the ultimate tip, and n is a factor of proportionality between 0.7 to 1.0, a n is an exponent having a value of from 0.65 to 0.75.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
16 words
A method according to claim 1, in which the razor blades are formed of stainless steel.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
28 words
A method according to claim 1, in which the razor blades are formed of a material which has a greater yield strength or fracture strength than stainless steel.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
17 words
A method according to claim 1, in which the bombarding ions are argon, nitrogen, or oxygen ions.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
66 words
A method according to claim 1, in which the ion bombardment is carried out with the ion guns operated at a beam voltage of 1000 to 1500 v and a beam current of 40 to 80 mA and with a supply of gas to form the bombarding ions of 3 to 5 ml/min, and with the razor blade stack at a bias of 0 to -3kv.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
72 words
A method according to claim 1, in which following formation or modification of the cutting edges, a material different from the razor blade material is deposited on the bombarded surfaces of the blades by evaporation while continuing the ion bombardment in order to refine and shape the coating of deposited material as it is laid down, the rate of material removal by the ion bombardment being less than the rate of deposition.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
41 words
A method according to claim 7, in which the razor blades are formed of stainless steel and the deposited material which is coated on the cutting edges is a material having a greater yield strength or fracture strength than stainless steel.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
24 words
A method according to claim 8, in which the deposited material is sapphire, boron nitride, a boron/boron nitride mixture, titanium nitride, or diamond-like carbon.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
112 words
A method according to claim 8, in which the initial ion bombardment and then the coating with ion bombardment stages are operated to provide coated cutting edges in which ##EQU4## in which w is the tip width, in μm, of the cutting edge at a distance d, in μm, from the ultimate tip, a is a factor of proportionality between 0.7 to 1.0, n is an exponent having a value of from 0.65 to 0.75, m is the ratio of the yield strength of the deposited material to that of stainless steel, and h is the thickness, in μm, of the coating at the distance d, in μm, from the ultimate tip.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
21 words
A method according to claim 7, in which the deposited material or a component thereof is evaporated by electron beam evaporation.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method according to claim 11, in which the electron beam evaporator is operated at a beam voltage of about 10 kv and beam current of from 150 to 350 mA.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
68 words
A method according to claim 1, in which ion bombardment is effected with the plane which lies within the stack and parallel to the major surfaces of the blades making an angle of other than 90° with a plane containing the axes of both the ion beams, the angle being such that substantially the whole of the cutting edges of the blades is accessed by the ion beams.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
81 words
Apparatus comprising a sealable vacuum chamber and located therein a workpiece holder and two ion sources for effecting ion bombardment, the ion sources being located so that they are on opposite sides of a plane contained within a stack of razor bladed adapted to be mounted in the workpiece holder and so that the axes of the ion beams produced by the ion sources are directed at the edges of the razor blades when a stack of blades is so mounted.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
81 words
Apparatus comprising a sealable vacuum chamber and located therein a workpiece holder and two ion sources for effecting ion bombardment, the ion sources being located so that they are on opposite sides of a plane contained within a stack of razor bladed adapted to be mounted in the workpiece holder and so that the axes of the ion beams produced by the ion sources are directed at the edges of the razor blades when a stack of blades is so mounted.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
38 words
Apparatus according to claim 14, in which each ion source is radially aligned with respect to an arc centered on an axis lying in a stack of blades when so mounted and is angularly movable along said arc.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
30 words
Apparatus according to claim 14, in which the vacuum chamber additionally contains an electron beam evaporator positioned to deposit material on a stack of blades mounted in the workpiece holder.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1994-07-15 | 1995-01-14 | 1995-07-16 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1998-07-15 | 1999-01-14 | 1999-07-16 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2002-07-15 | 2003-01-14 | 2003-07-16 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |