Patent US5207694A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US4987903A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4987903A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method and apparatus for identifying and alleviating semantic memory deficiencies
Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1988-11-14
•
Granted: 1991-01-29
•
Expires: 2008-11-14
Abstract
Abstract A method and apparatus for identifying and alleviating semantic memory deficiencies. An electroencephalogram signal is detected from the scalp of a subject to produce a signal representative of evoked response potentials. The subject is instructed to perform a semantic memory task in response to a stimulus. The amplitude of the most positive-going peak of the evoked response potential signal during the 270-550 ms period following the stimulus is measured. To determine whether the subject suffers from early Alzheimer's disease, the amplitude of the signal is compared to a standard determined by applying the same method to normal subjects. The amplitude of the signal may also be used to provide a feedback signal to the subject for training the subject to improve the subject's semantic memory skills. An apparatus is provided for implementing these steps using digital signal processing, and for providing a biofeedback signal to the subject.
Inventors
- 👤 William Keppel
- 👤 Kenneth R. Erickson
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 06:37
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61B; A61B5/00; A61B5/40; A61B5/4076; A61B5/4088; A61B5/24; A61B5/316; A61B5/369; A61B5/375; A61B5/377
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim
83 words
A method for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease, comprising: (a) detecting the electroencephalogram signal from the scalp of a subject to produce a signal representative of evoked response potentials; (b) instructing the subject to perform a semantic memory task in response to a stimulus; (c) measuring the amplitude of the most positive-going peak of said evoked response potential signal during the 270-550 ms period following said stimulus; and (d) comparing said amplitude to a standard to determine whether said amplitude indicates an Alzheimer's disease condition.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
83 words
A method for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease, comprising: (a) detecting the electroencephalogram signal from the scalp of a subject to produce a signal representative of evoked response potentials; (b) instructing the subject to perform a semantic memory task in response to a stimulus; (c) measuring the amplitude of the most positive-going peak of said evoked response potential signal during the 270-550 ms period following said stimulus; and (d) comparing said amplitude to a standard to determine whether said amplitude indicates an Alzheimer's disease condition.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said semantic memory task comprises observing a visual display of a sequence of symbols, and taking some action to indicate that the subject ascribes a predetermined meaning to a given symbol, where that is so.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 2, wherein said sequence of symbols comprises a set of infrequently repeated names interspersed randomly among repetitions of a frequently repeated name.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 3, wherein said action comprises actuating a switch means for producing a signal representative of whether the subject ascribes a male meaning or a female meaning to an observed name.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 2, further comprising presenting to said subject said visual display of a sequence of symbols, said period being measured from the time of presentation of each such symbol.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 5, wherein said sequence of symbols comprises a set of infrequently repeated symbols interspersed randomly among repetitions of a frequently repeated symbol.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
56 words
The method of claim 5, wherein said measuring step includes averaging the amplitude of said evoked response potential for each infrequently repeated symbol to produce a first average, averaging said evoked response potential for the frequently repeated symbol to produce a second average, and subtracting said second average from said first average to produce resultant data.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
56 words
The method of claim 7, wherein said maximum positive-going peak is measured by computing the difference between the amplitude of the maximum positive-going peak of said resultant data during the 270-550 ms period following said stimulus and the amplitude of the maximum negative-going peak of said resultant data during the 150-270 ms period following said stimulus.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said standard is the amplitude of the maximum positive peak for a set of subjects who do not have Alzheimer's disease.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said comparing step is performed by digitizing said evoked response potential signals and analyzing the digital representation of those waveforms.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
95 words
An apparatus for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease, comprising: (a) detection means for detecting the electroencephalogram signal from the scalp of a subject to produce a signal representative of evoked response potentials; (b) display means for displaying symbols to a subject in a predetermined manner; (c) input means for receiving from the subject a signal representative of whether the subject ascribes meaning to a given symbol; and (d) measurement means for measuring the amplitude of the most positive peak of said evoked response potential signal during the 270-550 ms period following the display of a given symbol.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
95 words
An apparatus for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease, comprising: (a) detection means for detecting the electroencephalogram signal from the scalp of a subject to produce a signal representative of evoked response potentials; (b) display means for displaying symbols to a subject in a predetermined manner; (c) input means for receiving from the subject a signal representative of whether the subject ascribes meaning to a given symbol; and (d) measurement means for measuring the amplitude of the most positive peak of said evoked response potential signal during the 270-550 ms period following the display of a given symbol.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
42 words
The apparatus of claim 11, wherein said measurement means comprises digitizer means for receiving said evoked response potentials from said detection means and producing a digital representation thereof, and digital computer means for operating on said digital representation to determine said amplitude.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
36 words
The apparatus of claim 12, wherein said display means includes means for presenting to said subject a sequence of symbols comprising a set of infrequently repeated names interspersed randomly among repetitions of a frequently repeated name.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
61 words
The apparatus of claim 13, wherein said digital computer means is programmed to average the amplitudes of said evoked response potential for infrequently repeated symbols to produce a first average, average the amplitude of said evoked response potentials for the frequently repeated symbols to produce a second average, and subtract said second average from said first average to produce resultant data.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
53 words
The apparatus of claim 14, wherein said digital computer means is programmed to subtract the amplitude of the maximum negative-going peak of said resultant data during the 150-270 ms period following said stimulus from the amplitude of the maximum positive-going peak of said resultant data during the 270-550 ms period following said stimulus.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
30 words
The apparatus of claim 12, wherein said digital computer means is programmed to compare the amplitude of said most positive-going peak to a standard amplitude and provide the difference therebetween.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4184485A
Cited
US4216781A
Cited
US4230125A
Cited
US4493327A
Cited
US4699153A
Cited
US4753246A
Cited
US4794533A
Cited
US4841983A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1994-01-28 | 1994-07-30 | 1995-01-29 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1998-01-28 | 1998-07-30 | 1999-01-29 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2002-01-28 | 2002-07-30 | 2003-01-29 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |