US4395635A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Gamma ray coincidence analysis system
Assignee: United States Department of Health and Human Services
•
Filing: 1981-01-26
•
Granted: 1983-07-26
•
Expires: 2001-01-26
Abstract
Abstract A gamma ray coincidence analysis system for a multichannel nuclear imaging device of the type employing scintillation detectors in ring-like arrays, with the detectors arranged in quadrants of the rings. The scintillation detectors in a ring have output circuits including respective timing discriminators and OR gates, and respective energy discriminators providing delayed energy pulses, and wherein timing pulses from the respective quadrants are fed via the OR gates to the inputs of a four-input coincidence detector without any delay except for a small delay internal to the discriminators and the very small delay of the OR gates. The delay of the energy pulses at the energy discriminators is for an energy validation period of 500 nsec. The output pulse from the coincidence detector is subsequently delayed for a similar period for verification of the energy levels of the two channels causing the coincidence. A data output signal is generated responsive to the concurrence of the delayed coincidence signal and the delayed energy verification pulses.
Inventors
- 👤 Walter S. Friauf
- 👤 Rodney A. Brooks
- 👤 Victor J. Sank
- 👤 Horace E. Cascio
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 15:30
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01T; G01T1/00; G01T1/29; G01T1/2914; G01T1/2985; A; A61; A61B; A61B6/00; A61B6/02; A61B6/03; A61B6/037
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim
180 words
A coincidence analysis system for a multichannel nuclear emission tomograph of the type employing scintillation detectors arranged in a plurality of groups, each said group comprising a plurality of spaced respective detectors defining scintillation detector channels, each of said detector channels producing output pulses having sharp leading edges, respective discriminator means associated with each of said channels, means for connecting the detectors to the respective discriminator means, said discriminator means being each provided with means generating a timing pulse and an energy verification pulse delayed by a predetermined validation period relative to said timing pulse, each said timing pulse being produced in response to each said sharp leading edge of a detector pulse, coincidence detector means to generate a resultant coincidence signal responsive to the coincidence of timing pulses from the detector channels of any two of the groups, means to delay said resultant coincidence signal for a time substantially equal to said energy validation period, and means to generate a data output signal responsive to the concurrence of the delayed resultant coincidence signal and the delayed energy verification pulses.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
180 words
A coincidence analysis system for a multichannel nuclear emission tomograph of the type employing scintillation detectors arranged in a plurality of groups, each said group comprising a plurality of spaced respective detectors defining scintillation detector channels, each of said detector channels producing output pulses having sharp leading edges, respective discriminator means associated with each of said channels, means for connecting the detectors to the respective discriminator means, said discriminator means being each provided with means generating a timing pulse and an energy verification pulse delayed by a predetermined validation period relative to said timing pulse, each said timing pulse being produced in response to each said sharp leading edge of a detector pulse, coincidence detector means to generate a resultant coincidence signal responsive to the coincidence of timing pulses from the detector channels of any two of the groups, means to delay said resultant coincidence signal for a time substantially equal to said energy validation period, and means to generate a data output signal responsive to the concurrence of the delayed resultant coincidence signal and the delayed energy verification pulses.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
29 words
The coincidence analysis system of claim 1, and wherein the coincidence detector means comprises a multiple-input coincidence detector with inputs corresponding to the number of groups of scintillation detectors.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
48 words
The coincidence analysis system of claim 1, and means to generate an identification coding signal from the delayed energy verification pulse, and wherein said means to generate the data output signal includes means responsive to the concurrence of the delayed resultant coincidence signal and the identification coding signals.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
17 words
The coincidence analysis system of claim 1, and wherein the energy validation period is approximately 500 nsec.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
18 words
The coincidence analysis system of claim 1, and wherein said timing pulse is approximately 50 nsec in length.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
19 words
The coincidence analysis system of claim 5, and wherein the energy verification pulse is approximately 100 nsec in length.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
20 words
The coincidence analysis system of claim 1, and wherein each group of scintillation detectors comprises a quadrant containing 32 detectors.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
24 words
The coincidence analysis system of claim 7, and wherein the coincidence detector means comprises a four-input coincidence detector with inputs from four respective quadrants.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
40 words
The coincidence analysis system of claim 8, and wherein said coincidence detector means includes OR gate means arranged to transmit the timing pulses from the discriminator means associated with the respective quadrants to the inputs of the four-input coincidence detector.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
127 words
A method of coincidence analysis for multi-channel nuclear emission topography which employs a ring-like array of scintillation detectors arranged in groups, each said detector producing timing pulses having sharp leading edges, comprising generating timing signals and energy signals responsive to substantially concurrent scintillations detected in two different groups, said timing signals being produced in response to said sharp leading edges of said detector pulses, delaying the energy signal for a predetermined energy validation period, generating a coincidence signal responsive to the coincidence of two timing signals from said two different groups, thereafter delaying said coincidence signal for a period substantially the same as said energy validation period, and forming an output data signal responsive to the concurrence of said delayed coincidence signal and said delayed energy signals.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
127 words
A method of coincidence analysis for multi-channel nuclear emission topography which employs a ring-like array of scintillation detectors arranged in groups, each said detector producing timing pulses having sharp leading edges, comprising generating timing signals and energy signals responsive to substantially concurrent scintillations detected in two different groups, said timing signals being produced in response to said sharp leading edges of said detector pulses, delaying the energy signal for a predetermined energy validation period, generating a coincidence signal responsive to the coincidence of two timing signals from said two different groups, thereafter delaying said coincidence signal for a period substantially the same as said energy validation period, and forming an output data signal responsive to the concurrence of said delayed coincidence signal and said delayed energy signals.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 10, and employing an energy validation signal delay of approximately 500 nsec.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method of claim 11, and employing a timing signal in the form of a pulse with a duration of approximately 50 nsec and an energy signal in the form of a pulse with a duration of approximately 100 nsec.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1986-07-25 | 1987-01-24 | 1987-07-26 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1990-07-25 | 1991-01-24 | 1991-07-26 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1994-07-25 | 1995-01-24 | 1995-07-26 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |