Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim
134 words
For use with a scintillation counter utilizing at least two detectors in a coincidence counting technique, a method for determining a random coincidence count due to events resulting in single-quantum emissions which may chance to occur in such a manner that pairs of essentially coincident single-quantum events are detected one in each detector and are erroneously counted as radioactive disintegrations occurring in a sample, said method comprising the steps of: delaying output pulses from one of the detectors; detecting coincidences between the delayed pulses from one detector and the undelayed pulses from the other detector, to obtain a signal indicative of an approximate random coincidence count; and correcting the approximate random coincidence count to compensate for coincidences involving at least one pulse due to a real coincidence attributable to events resulting in multiple-quanta emissions.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
134 words
For use with a scintillation counter utilizing at least two detectors in a coincidence counting technique, a method for determining a random coincidence count due to events resulting in single-quantum emissions which may chance to occur in such a manner that pairs of essentially coincident single-quantum events are detected one in each detector and are erroneously counted as radioactive disintegrations occurring in a sample, said method comprising the steps of: delaying output pulses from one of the detectors; detecting coincidences between the delayed pulses from one detector and the undelayed pulses from the other detector, to obtain a signal indicative of an approximate random coincidence count; and correcting the approximate random coincidence count to compensate for coincidences involving at least one pulse due to a real coincidence attributable to events resulting in multiple-quanta emissions.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
62 words
A method as set forth in claim 1, wherein said correcting step includes: conventionally detecting real coincidences between pulses from the two detectors; delaying the real coincidences between the two detectors; eliminating pulses that are coincident with the real coincidences; and eliminating pulses that are coincident with the delayed real coincidences, to obtain a signal indicative of a corrected random coincidence count.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
36 words
A method as set forth in claim 2, and further including the steps of: comparing the corrected random coincidence count rate with an acceptable value; and restarting counting if the corrected rate exceeds the acceptable rate.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
199 words
For use with a scintillation counter utilizing at least two detectors in a coincidence counting technique, a method for determining a random coincidence count due to events resulting in single-quantum emissions which may chance to occur in such a manner that pairs of essentially coincident single-quantum events are detected one in each detector and are erroneously counted as radioactive disintegrations occurring in a sample, said method comprising the steps of: detecting real and apparent coincidences between pulses from the two detectors; delaying pulses from one of the detectors; detecting coincidences between the delayed pulses from one detector and undelayed pulses from the other, to obtain a random coincidence pulse train from which an approximate random coincidence count rate can be determined; delaying the real and apparent coincidences between pulses from the two detectors; eliminating from the random coincidence pulse train, in an anti-coincidence circuit, those coincidence pulses that occur essentially simultaneously with, and are therefore attributable to, either originally detected real and apparent coincidences, or delayed real and apparent coincidences, to obtain a corrected random coincidence pulse train; accumulating a count of pulses occurring in the corrected random coincidence pulse train, to obtain a corrected random coincidence count rate.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
199 words
For use with a scintillation counter utilizing at least two detectors in a coincidence counting technique, a method for determining a random coincidence count due to events resulting in single-quantum emissions which may chance to occur in such a manner that pairs of essentially coincident single-quantum events are detected one in each detector and are erroneously counted as radioactive disintegrations occurring in a sample, said method comprising the steps of: detecting real and apparent coincidences between pulses from the two detectors; delaying pulses from one of the detectors; detecting coincidences between the delayed pulses from one detector and undelayed pulses from the other, to obtain a random coincidence pulse train from which an approximate random coincidence count rate can be determined; delaying the real and apparent coincidences between pulses from the two detectors; eliminating from the random coincidence pulse train, in an anti-coincidence circuit, those coincidence pulses that occur essentially simultaneously with, and are therefore attributable to, either originally detected real and apparent coincidences, or delayed real and apparent coincidences, to obtain a corrected random coincidence pulse train; accumulating a count of pulses occurring in the corrected random coincidence pulse train, to obtain a corrected random coincidence count rate.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
44 words
A method as set forth in claim 4, and further including the steps of: comparing the corrected random coincidence count rate with an acceptable value of the rate; and reinitiating the measurement process if the corrected random coincidence count rate exceeds the acceptable value.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
157 words
For use with a scintillation counter utilizing at least two detectors in a coincidence counting technique, apparatus for determining a random coincidence count due to events resulting in single-quantum emissions which may chance to occur in such a manner that pairs of essentially coincident single-quantum events are detected one in each detector and are erroneously counted as radioactive disintegrations occurring in a sample, said apparatus comprising: first coincidence detection means for detecting real and chance coincidences between pulses from the two detectors; time delay means for delaying pulses from one of the detectors; second coincidence detection means for detecting coincidences between delayed pulses from said time delay means and undelayed pulses from the other of the detectors, to obtain a pulse train indicative of an approximate random coincidence count; and compensating means for correcting said pulse train indicative of an approximate random coincidence count, to obtain thereby a pulse train indicative of a corrected random coincidence count.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
157 words
For use with a scintillation counter utilizing at least two detectors in a coincidence counting technique, apparatus for determining a random coincidence count due to events resulting in single-quantum emissions which may chance to occur in such a manner that pairs of essentially coincident single-quantum events are detected one in each detector and are erroneously counted as radioactive disintegrations occurring in a sample, said apparatus comprising: first coincidence detection means for detecting real and chance coincidences between pulses from the two detectors; time delay means for delaying pulses from one of the detectors; second coincidence detection means for detecting coincidences between delayed pulses from said time delay means and undelayed pulses from the other of the detectors, to obtain a pulse train indicative of an approximate random coincidence count; and compensating means for correcting said pulse train indicative of an approximate random coincidence count, to obtain thereby a pulse train indicative of a corrected random coincidence count.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
82 words
Apparatus as set forth in claim 6, wherein said compensating means includes: second time delay means for delaying output pulses from said first coincidence detection means by a time equal to the delay time of said first time delay means; and anti-coincidence circuit means for eliminating from said pulse train indicative of an approximate random coincidence count any pulses coincident with output pulses from said first coincidence detection means and any pulses coincident with output pulses from said second time delay means.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
31 words
Apparatus as set forth in claim 7, and further including: counting means for accumulating a corrected random coincidence count; and comparison means for comparing the corrected count with a preselected value.