US5339826A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for training material evaluation with method of EEG spectral estimation
Assignee: Westinghouse Electric Co LLC
•
Filing: 1991-12-09
•
Granted: 1994-08-23
•
Expires: 2011-12-09
Abstract
Abstract The invention is a method and apparatus in which student EEG measurements are made during the videotaped presentation of training materials. Alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (16-24 Hz) activity present during segments of the material directed to a learning objective are used to determine attention and cognitive activity during the training material. An increased level of attention relates to increased understanding of the material. An increased level of cognitive activity relate directly to incorrect understanding of the material. Evoked potential responses are also measured in response to multiple choice questions on the learning objections presented subsequent to the training materials. A difference between midterm responses for correct and incorrect answers measures correct understanding of the subject matter of the multiple choice question. Comparing the alpha, beta and evoked potential results for a learning objective validates the indication of effectiveness if the results correlate. To evaluate the EEG spectra for varying length recorded signal segments and between individuals with different magnitude responses, the EEG signals are normalized and interpolated to the same length before a windowed FFT is performed the peaks in the FFT are then found.
Inventors
- 👤 Albert L. Schmidt
- 👤 Ellen K. McKinley
- 👤 Lewis F. Hanes
- 👤 Michael R. Morris
- 👤 Patrick J. McKenzie
- 👤 Paul H. Haley
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 02:43
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61B; A61B5/00; A61B5/24; A61B5/316; A61B5/369; A61B5/377; A61B5/378; A61B5/72; A61B5/7235; A61B5/7253; A61B5/7257
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
123 words
A method of evaluating training material, comprising the steps of: (a) measuring nonattention and cognitive baselines; (b) presenting the training material to a subject and recording the electroencephalographic (EEG) activity of the subject; and (c) measuring one of an attentive level and a cognitive level of the subject using the EEG activity by comparing the attention level and the cognitive level to attention and cognitive thresholds, where one of high attention levels and low cognitive levels indicate effective training material, where one of the attention level above the attention threshold and the cognitive level below the cognitive threshold indicates effective training material and where the attention threshold is 0.10 of the nonattention baseline and the cognitive threshold is 0.244 of the cognitive baseline.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
123 words
A method of evaluating training material, comprising the steps of: (a) measuring nonattention and cognitive baselines; (b) presenting the training material to a subject and recording the electroencephalographic (EEG) activity of the subject; and (c) measuring one of an attentive level and a cognitive level of the subject using the EEG activity by comparing the attention level and the cognitive level to attention and cognitive thresholds, where one of high attention levels and low cognitive levels indicate effective training material, where one of the attention level above the attention threshold and the cognitive level below the cognitive threshold indicates effective training material and where the attention threshold is 0.10 of the nonattention baseline and the cognitive threshold is 0.244 of the cognitive baseline.
Claim 3
Independent Claim
184 words
A method of evaluating videotaped training material, comprising the steps of: (a) presenting the videotaped training material to a subject and recording the electroencephalographic (EEG) activity of the subject during the presentation; (b) measuring an attention level and a cognitive level of the subject using EEG alpha and beta activity of comparing the attention level and the cognitive level to attention and cognitive thresholds, where the attention level above the attention threshold and the cognitive level below the cognitive threshold indicates effective training material, the attention and cognitive thresholds are determined by measuring baselines and the attention threshold is 0.10 of a nonattention baseline and the cognitive threshold is 0.244 of a cognitive baseline; (c) presenting a multiple choice question to the subject on the training material followed by usually presenting incorrect and correct answers; (d) measuring evoked potentials produced by the subject when the correct and incorrect answers are presented; and (e) comparing the evoked potentials for the correct and incorrect answers, where an evoked potential for a correct answer having an amplitude higher than for an incorrect answer indicates effective training material.
Claim 4
Independent Claim
184 words
A method of evaluating videotaped training material, comprising the steps of: (a) presenting the videotaped training material to a subject and recording the electroencephalographic (EEG) activity of the subject during the presentation; (b) measuring an attention level and a cognitive level of the subject using EEG alpha and beta activity of comparing the attention level and the cognitive level to attention and cognitive thresholds, where the attention level above the attention threshold and the cognitive level below the cognitive threshold indicates effective training material, the attention and cognitive thresholds are determined by measuring baselines and the attention threshold is 0.10 of a nonattention baseline and the cognitive threshold is 0.244 of a cognitive baseline; (c) presenting a multiple choice question to the subject on the training material followed by usually presenting incorrect and correct answers; (d) measuring evoked potentials produced by the subject when the correct and incorrect answers are presented; and (e) comparing the evoked potentials for the correct and incorrect answers, where an evoked potential for a correct answer having an amplitude higher than for an incorrect answer indicates effective training material.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
68 words
A method of electroencephalographic (EEG) spectral estimation, comprising the steps of: (a) normalizing EEG data; (b) upsampling the EEG data to a number of data points N evenly divisible by 2 n where n is a positive integer and determining an interpolation factor; (c) performing a three term window FFT with overlapping windows to obtain an EEG spectrum; and (d) adjusting the EEG spectrum using the interpolation factor.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
68 words
A method of electroencephalographic (EEG) spectral estimation, comprising the steps of: (a) normalizing EEG data; (b) upsampling the EEG data to a number of data points N evenly divisible by 2 n where n is a positive integer and determining an interpolation factor; (c) performing a three term window FFT with overlapping windows to obtain an EEG spectrum; and (d) adjusting the EEG spectrum using the interpolation factor.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
24 words
A method as recited in claim 3, further comprising the steps of: (e) determining a peak for a frequency range of the EEG spectrum.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
17 words
A method as recited in claim 3, wherein step (c) includes averaging spectra of the overlapping windows.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
16 words
A method as recited in claim 3, further comprising (e) obtaining a peak in the spectrum.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
20 words
A method as recited in claim 6, wherein the peak is one of an average peak and a maximum peak.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1997-08-22 | 1998-02-21 | 1998-08-23 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2001-08-22 | 2002-02-21 | 2002-08-23 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2005-08-22 | 2006-02-21 | 2006-08-23 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |