US5314473A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Prosthesis for preventing gastric reflux into the esophagus
Assignee: Biomedix SA Switzerland
•
Filing: 1993-01-05
•
Granted: 1994-05-24
•
Expires: 2013-01-05
Abstract
Abstract The prosthesis is configured like an anti-return valve ranged preferably in the area where the esophagus and the hiatal hernia meet. Said valve is comprised of a tubular part associated with an annular fixing element. The tubular part flattens progressively to form two joined lips. It is possible to form said valve with a wall thickness which increases from the free end of the lips towards the annular fixing part in order to avoid an easy returning under the effect of the surging pressure. During the passage of the alimentary bolus, the lips are spaced apart and joined again owing to their natural elasticity. A metal wire embedded in the annular fixing part is used for the radiologic marking.
Inventors
- 👤 Norman J. Godin
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 08:05
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61F; A61F2/00; A61F2/02; A61F2/04; A61F2/24; A61F2/2412; A61B; A61B90/00; A61B90/39; A61F2002/044; A61F2250/00; A61F2250/0058; A61F2250/0096; A61F2250/0098
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
299 words
A prosthesis for preventing gastric reflux into an esophagus comprising: a valve means for controlling a flow direction through the esophagus, said valve means having first and second ends, a longitudinal axis, a generally tubular, resilient side wall, and a flow passage defined therethrough, said valve means being formed from a resilient, bicompatible material and being implantable; said first end of said valve means having a circular cross-section substantially corresponding to a cross-section of the esophagus to allow fixation of said first end to a wall of a hiatal hernia of the esophagus; the resilient side wall of said valve means being progressively, resiliently collapsed adjacent said second end thereby defining a segment of said valve means having resiliently collapsed side walls to at least substantially constrict said flow passage at said second end of said valve means, so that when said valve means is secured to the wall of the hiatal hernia with said second end disposed downstream of the first end, 1) any force generated on an alimentary bolus by a peristaltic wave of the esophagus tends to space apart the resiliently collapsed side walls whereby the second end of said valve means can offer a passage cross-section that is substantially equal to that of the first end of the valve means, 2) a regurgitate gastric reflux force which is substantially greater than a force of a peristaltic wave urges said resiliently collapsed side walls to invert to a position of repose to define, solely for a duration of said gastric reflux force, a flow path for vomit, and 3) any gastric reflux force which is not substantially greater than a force of a peristaltic wave urges said resiliently collapsed side walls to substantially close said second end, thereby to substantially prevent gastric reflux into the esophagus.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
299 words
A prosthesis for preventing gastric reflux into an esophagus comprising: a valve means for controlling a flow direction through the esophagus, said valve means having first and second ends, a longitudinal axis, a generally tubular, resilient side wall, and a flow passage defined therethrough, said valve means being formed from a resilient, bicompatible material and being implantable; said first end of said valve means having a circular cross-section substantially corresponding to a cross-section of the esophagus to allow fixation of said first end to a wall of a hiatal hernia of the esophagus; the resilient side wall of said valve means being progressively, resiliently collapsed adjacent said second end thereby defining a segment of said valve means having resiliently collapsed side walls to at least substantially constrict said flow passage at said second end of said valve means, so that when said valve means is secured to the wall of the hiatal hernia with said second end disposed downstream of the first end, 1) any force generated on an alimentary bolus by a peristaltic wave of the esophagus tends to space apart the resiliently collapsed side walls whereby the second end of said valve means can offer a passage cross-section that is substantially equal to that of the first end of the valve means, 2) a regurgitate gastric reflux force which is substantially greater than a force of a peristaltic wave urges said resiliently collapsed side walls to invert to a position of repose to define, solely for a duration of said gastric reflux force, a flow path for vomit, and 3) any gastric reflux force which is not substantially greater than a force of a peristaltic wave urges said resiliently collapsed side walls to substantially close said second end, thereby to substantially prevent gastric reflux into the esophagus.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
39 words
A prosthesis as claimed in claim 1, wherein said second end of said valve means defines an opening having a cross-section less than a cross-section of the first end when the valve means is in said position of repose.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
25 words
A prosthesis as claimed in claim 1, wherein said tubular side wall of said valve means progressively thins along a portion of a length thereof.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
51 words
A prosthesis as claimed in claim 1, further comprising first and second longitudinal, diametrically opposed slits in said tubular side wall which extend from said second end along a portion of a length of the valve means, thereby to facilitate opening of said second end for passage of an alimentary bolus.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
32 words
A prosthesis as claimed in claim 4, further comprising at least one reinforcing rib provided on said side wall adjacent said second end to stiffen said side wall adjacent said second end.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
20 words
A prosthesis as claimed in claim 5, wherein said at least one reinforcing rib extends longitudinally of said side wall.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
28 words
A prosthesis as claimed in claim 5, wherein said reinforcing rib is defined on an exterior surface of said side wall and integrally molded with said valve means.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
32 words
A prosthesis as claimed in claim 1, further comprising at least one reinforcing rib provided on said side wall adjacent said second end to stiffen said side wall adjacent said second end.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
17 words
A prosthesis as claimed in claim 8, wherein said reinforcing rib extends longitudinally of said side wall.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
28 words
A prosthesis as claimed in claim 8, wherein said reinforcing rib is defined on an exterior surface of said side wall and integrally molded with said valve means.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
29 words
A prosthesis as claimed in claim 1, wherein said resiliently collapsed side walls are collapsed symmetrically with respect to a plane comprising the longitudinal axis of said valve means.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US15192A
Cited
US3898701A
Cited
US3926175A
Cited
US4218782A
Cited
US4204282A
Cited
US4265694A
Cited
US4417360A
Cited
US4451936A
Cited
US4403604A
Cited
US4605407A
Cited
US4642105A
Cited
US4759758A
Cited
US4763653A
Cited
US4778461A
Cited
US4747849A
Cited
US5084061A
Cited
US5019102A
Cited
US4846836A
Cited
WO1991001117A1
Cited
US5006106A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1997-05-23 | 1997-11-22 | 1998-05-24 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2001-05-23 | 2001-11-22 | 2002-05-24 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2005-05-23 | 2005-11-22 | 2006-05-24 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |