US4923290A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Polarization scrambler
Assignee: US Philips Corp
•
Filing: 1988-08-16
•
Granted: 1990-05-08
•
Expires: 2008-08-16
Abstract
Abstract The invention relates to a polarization scrambler comprising a controllable optical phase retardation element for retarding with respect to one another components of a light beam with a different state of polarization, the light beam propagating through the element, and a control arrangement for controlling the phase retardation element, said control arrangement being adapted to supply a control signal so that as a function of time the phase retardation is controlled in such a way that with a given state of polarization (SOP) of the light entering the polarization scrambler varying states of polarization occur at its output in such a way that, averaged in time, the light intensities emerging in each SOP are at least substantially equal. An arrangement suitable for arbitrary input states of polarization is obtained when at least a further controllable phase retardation element (2, 3) connected to a control arrangement and succeeding the first element in the light propagation direction is provided which, represented on the Poincare sphere, creates states of polarization in accordance with a rotational axis which is different from that associated with the first phase retardation element and in that the phase retardation elements (1, 2, 3 ) are controlled by the control arrangement at different frequencies (f 1 , f 2 , f 3 ) or in an uncorrelated aperiodical manner.
Inventors
- 👤 Ernst Brinkmeyer
- 👤 Wolfgang Brennecke
- 👤 Rainer J. R. W. Otto
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 16:09
CPC Classifications
G; G02; G02F; G02F1/00; G02F1/01; G02F1/0136; G02F1/0128; G02F1/0131; G02F1/0134
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
159 words
A polarization scrambler for light comprising a controllable optical retardation element of which the retardation is controllable as a function of time by a control arrangement in such a way that with a given stat of polarization of light entering the polarization scrambler, varying states of polarization occur at its output in such a way that, averaged in time, light intensities emerging in each state of polarization are at least substantially equal, characterized in that at least a further retardation element controllable by a control arrangement and following a first element in a light propagation direction is provided which element, represented on a Poincare sphere, creates states of polarization in accordance with a rotational axis which is different from that associated with the first retardation element and in that the retardation elements (1, 2, 3) are controllable by the control arrangements at different frequencies (f 1 , f 2 , f 3 ) or in an uncorrelated aperiodical manner.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
159 words
A polarization scrambler for light comprising a controllable optical retardation element of which the retardation is controllable as a function of time by a control arrangement in such a way that with a given stat of polarization of light entering the polarization scrambler, varying states of polarization occur at its output in such a way that, averaged in time, light intensities emerging in each state of polarization are at least substantially equal, characterized in that at least a further retardation element controllable by a control arrangement and following a first element in a light propagation direction is provided which element, represented on a Poincare sphere, creates states of polarization in accordance with a rotational axis which is different from that associated with the first retardation element and in that the retardation elements (1, 2, 3) are controllable by the control arrangements at different frequencies (f 1 , f 2 , f 3 ) or in an uncorrelated aperiodical manner.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
41 words
An arrangement as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the retardation elements are two linear retardation elements (5, 6) whose principal axes extend to each other in an acute angle in a range between 25° and 65°, preferably approximately 45°.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
24 words
An arrangement as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that the retardation of the linear retardation elements (5, 6) is achievable by stress birefringence.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
52 words
An arrangement as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that the linear retardation elements comprise a monomode light waveguide (7) and two pressure generators (5, 6), which pressure generators are arranged one after the other in a light waveguide direction and with an angularly displaced pressure direction on the light waveguide (7).
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
48 words
An arrangement as claimed in claim 4 characterized in that the pressure generators comprise a ferro-magnetic yoke, a ferro-magnetic armature and an operating coil (8, 9), which operating coil is AC-controllable so that an electro-magnetically generated force is applicable to the monomode light waveguide to create stress birefringence.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
29 words
An arrangement as claimed in claim 4 characterized in that a linear retardation element for creating stress birefringence comprises a piezo-ceramical pressure generator to which an AC-current is connected.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
48 words
An arrangement as claimed in any one of claim 2, characterized in that the control arrangements for the linear retardation elements are adapted to generate control signals which produce retardation values are variable in a time-dependent manner about a differential angle of 0 to 2π(1±0.1), particularly approximately 2π.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
49 words
An arrangement as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that the control arrangements are adapted to generate control signals at which constant time-dependent variation of a triangular curve differs at any instant to a smaller extent than corresponds to a positive or negative difference with an envelope sine curve.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
19 words
An arrangement as claimed in claim 1, characterized by the use of a linear and a circular retardation element.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
18 words
An arrangement as claimed in claim 9, characterized in that the circular retardation element is a Faraday rotator.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
51 words
An arrangement as claimed in claim 9, characterized in that the control arrangements for the circular retardation elements are adapted to generate control signals which produce a retardation so that rotation of the polarization plane varies in a time-dependent manner in an angular range of 0 to π(1±0.1), particularly approximately π.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
59 words
An arrangement as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that control frequencies (f 1 , f 2 , f 3 ) for generating periodically alternating retardations of the retardation elements (1, 2, 3 and 5, 6) as well as frequency differences are larger than a reciprocal value of a measurement interval for capturing output light of the polarization scrambler.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
28 words
An arrangement as claimed in any one of claims 4, 7, 8, 11 or 12 characterized in that a bending device is associated with a monomode light waveguide.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
147 words
A scrambler for altering the state of polarization of light comprising: first and second optical retardation elements, the amount of retardation of said retardation elements being controllable as a function of time by means of a control input; control means for controlling said first and second retardation elements, said control means controlling said second retardation element such that the second retardation element, as represented on the Poincare sphere, alters the states of polarization in accordance with a rotational axis which is different from that associated with said first retardation element and that said control means are controllable at at least one of, differing frequencies, and in an uncoordinated aperiodic manner such that varying states of polarization occur at the output of the second retardation element in such a way that, averaged in time, the light intensities emerging in different states of polarization are at least substantially equal.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
147 words
A scrambler for altering the state of polarization of light comprising: first and second optical retardation elements, the amount of retardation of said retardation elements being controllable as a function of time by means of a control input; control means for controlling said first and second retardation elements, said control means controlling said second retardation element such that the second retardation element, as represented on the Poincare sphere, alters the states of polarization in accordance with a rotational axis which is different from that associated with said first retardation element and that said control means are controllable at at least one of, differing frequencies, and in an uncoordinated aperiodic manner such that varying states of polarization occur at the output of the second retardation element in such a way that, averaged in time, the light intensities emerging in different states of polarization are at least substantially equal.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
35 words
The polarization scrambler as claimed in claim 14 wherein said retardation elements comprise two linear retardation elements having principle axes extending at an acute angle to each other in the range between 25° and 65°.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
23 words
The polarization scrambler as claimed in claim 14 wherein said retardation elements comprise linear retardation elements operating by the principle of stress birefringence.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
32 words
The polarization scrambler as claimed in claim 14 wherein at least one of said first and second optical retardation elements comprise a circular retardation element in the form of a faraday rotator.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
49 words
The polarization scrambler as claimed in claim 17 wherein said pressure generators comprise a ferro-magnetic yoke, a ferro-magnetic armature and an operating coil which is controlled by the application of alternating current so that an electromagnetically generated force is applied to the monomode light waveguide to create stress birefringence.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
52 words
The polarization scrambler as claimed in claim 14 wherein said first and second optical retardation elements comprise linear retardation elements including a monomode light waveguide and two pressure generators which are arranged sequentially along said waveguide and which are angularly displaced with respect to the direction of pressure exerted on said waveguide.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2780958A
Cited
US3239671A
Cited
US3407364A
Cited
US3484151A
Cited
US3435228A
Cited
US3558214A
Cited
US3558215A
Cited
US3645603A
Cited
US4097110A
Cited
US4222668A
Cited
DE3530738A1
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1993-05-07 | 1993-11-06 | 1994-05-08 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1997-05-07 | 1997-11-06 | 1998-05-08 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2001-05-07 | 2001-11-06 | 2002-05-08 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |