US4844086A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Cross correlation analysis in brain electrical activity mapping
Assignee: Boston Children's Hospital
•
Filing: 1987-04-13
•
Granted: 1989-07-04
•
Expires: 2007-04-13
Abstract
Abstract A diagnostic method is disclosed wherein brain evoked potential (EP) data from a plurality of electrode sites on the patient's head is gathered and compared with a comparable EP for normal patients by forming (1) the cross-correlation between the patient's EP and the normal EP, (2) the maximum cross-correlation for any time shift in a selected period or Cmax, and (3) the time shift Tmax at which the maximum correlation occurs. Selected ones of these values for particular evoked potentials are used to compute diagnostic feature values, and a plurality of diagnostic feature values are used to achieve a diagnosis of brain pathology.
Inventors
- 👤 Frank H. Duffy
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 19:42
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61B; A61B5/00; A61B5/24; A61B5/316; A61B5/369; A61B5/377; A61B5/74; A61B5/742; A61B5/743
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim
73 words
The method of detecting and characterizing brain pathology in patient, comprising the steps of: gathering the patient's evoked potential for a plurality of electrodes; for each electrode performing a cross-correlation of the patient's evoked potential to an evoked potential for a respective electrode of a normal patient to obtain a plurality of cross-correlation figures; mapping the cross-correlation figures for each electrode; and using said mapped cross-correlation figures to detect and characterize brain pathology.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
73 words
The method of detecting and characterizing brain pathology in patient, comprising the steps of: gathering the patient's evoked potential for a plurality of electrodes; for each electrode performing a cross-correlation of the patient's evoked potential to an evoked potential for a respective electrode of a normal patient to obtain a plurality of cross-correlation figures; mapping the cross-correlation figures for each electrode; and using said mapped cross-correlation figures to detect and characterize brain pathology.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said cross-correlation is performed for a selected segment of the evoked potential.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
80 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said step of gathering comprises gathering a patient's visual evoked response evoked potential for each said electrode and wherein said step of performing comprises computing a numerical diagnostic feature comprising the mean of the cross-correlation of each said visual evoked response evoked potential from each electrode with a normal visual evoked response evoked potential from time 0 to 400 msec with no lagging between the patient's evoked potential and the normal evoked potential (CVS1).
Claim 5
Independent Claim
99 words
The method of detecting and characterizing brain pathology in a patient, comprising the steps of: gathering the patient's evoked potential for a plurality of electrodes; for each electrode performing a cross-correlation of the patient's evoked potential to an evoked potential for a respective electrode of a normal patient for selected relative time shifts between the patient's evoked potential and the normal evoked potential to obtain a plurality of cross-correlation figures for each electrode; selecting, for each electrode, the maximum cross-correlation figure; mapping the selected maximum cross-correlation figures; and using said mapped cross-correlation figures to detect and characterize brain pathology.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
99 words
The method of detecting and characterizing brain pathology in a patient, comprising the steps of: gathering the patient's evoked potential for a plurality of electrodes; for each electrode performing a cross-correlation of the patient's evoked potential to an evoked potential for a respective electrode of a normal patient for selected relative time shifts between the patient's evoked potential and the normal evoked potential to obtain a plurality of cross-correlation figures for each electrode; selecting, for each electrode, the maximum cross-correlation figure; mapping the selected maximum cross-correlation figures; and using said mapped cross-correlation figures to detect and characterize brain pathology.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said selected time shifts span the range from 0 to 100 msec.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 3 further comprising computing a numerical diagnostic feature comprising the maximum value of said selected cross-correlation figures.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 5 further comprising computing a numerical diagnostic feature comprising the minimum value of said selected cross-correlation figures.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
137 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said step of gathering comprises gathering a patient's visual evoked response evoked potential for each said electrode and wherein said step of performing comprises computing a first numerical diagnostic feature comprising the mean of the cross-correlation of each said visual evoked response evoked potential from each electrode with a normal visual evoked response evoked potential from time 0 to 400 msec with no lagging between the patient's evoked potential and the normal evoked potential, (CVS1), wherein said method further comprises computing a second numerical diagnostic feature comprising the maximum value of said selected cross-correlation figures, wherein said method further comprises computing a third numerical diagnostic feature comprising the minimum value of said selected cross-correlation figures, and wherein a diagnosis is made on the basis of two of said numerical diagnostic features.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said cross-correlation is performed for a selected segment of the evoked potential.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
87 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said step of gathering comprises gathering a patient's auditory evoked response evoked potential for each said electrode and wherein said step of performing comprises computing a numerical diagnostic feature comprising the left-right difference of the mean of the maximum cross-correlation obtained at any electrode between the patient's auditory evoked response evoked potential and a normal mean auditory evoked response evoked potential for various time shifts between the patient's evoked potential and the normal evoked potential across the interval 120-160 msec (CAY1).
Claim 13
Independent Claim
88 words
The method of detecting and characterizing brain pathology in a patient, comprising the steps of: gathering the patient's evoked potential for a plurality of electrodes; for each electrode performing a corss-correlation of the patient's evoked potential to an evoked potential for a respective electrode of a normal patient for selected relative time shifts between the patient's evoked potential and the normal evoked potential; mapping the time shift at which maximum cross-correlation occurred (TMaxC) for each electrode; and using said mapped time shifts to detect and characterize brain pathology.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
88 words
The method of detecting and characterizing brain pathology in a patient, comprising the steps of: gathering the patient's evoked potential for a plurality of electrodes; for each electrode performing a corss-correlation of the patient's evoked potential to an evoked potential for a respective electrode of a normal patient for selected relative time shifts between the patient's evoked potential and the normal evoked potential; mapping the time shift at which maximum cross-correlation occurred (TMaxC) for each electrode; and using said mapped time shifts to detect and characterize brain pathology.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 11 wherein said selected time shifts span the range from 0 to 100 msec.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 11 wherein said cross-correlation is performed for a selected segment of the evoked potential.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3696808A
Cited
US4408616A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1992-07-03 | 1993-01-02 | 1993-07-04 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1996-07-03 | 1997-01-02 | 1997-07-04 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2000-07-03 | 2001-01-02 | 2001-07-04 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |