Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
138 words
An improved method for measuring the sugar content of a fluid in the presence of interfering foreign substances by means of an electrocatalytic sugar sensor which includes a test electrode having a membrane arranged in front of it, said method including the steps of applying potentiostatically to said electrode a reactivation potential and a test potential and measuring and evaluating a current flowing during a test period with a set time delay to determine sugar content said improvement including the step of: applying a reduction potential for a period of time shorter than said test period to said test electrode to reduce the effect of said interfering foreign substances, said reduction potential being more negative than said test potential and being applied after the application of said reactivation potential and prior to the application of said test potential.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
138 words
An improved method for measuring the sugar content of a fluid in the presence of interfering foreign substances by means of an electrocatalytic sugar sensor which includes a test electrode having a membrane arranged in front of it, said method including the steps of applying potentiostatically to said electrode a reactivation potential and a test potential and measuring and evaluating a current flowing during a test period with a set time delay to determine sugar content said improvement including the step of: applying a reduction potential for a period of time shorter than said test period to said test electrode to reduce the effect of said interfering foreign substances, said reduction potential being more negative than said test potential and being applied after the application of said reactivation potential and prior to the application of said test potential.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein said reduction potential is applied to said test electrode for a time duration ranging from 1 second to 10 seconds.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
61 words
The method as in claim 1 or 2, wherein said reactivation is greater than 800 mV, wherein said test potential lies in the range of between 200 mV and 800 mV, and wherein said reduction potential is less than 200 mV, said reactivation potential, test potential, and reduction potential being measured with reference to the potential of a reversible hydrogen electrode.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method as in claim 3, wherein said reactivation potential lies in the range of between 1200 mV and 1600 mV, wherein said test potential is approximately 400 mV, and wherein said reduction potential is approximately 100 mV.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method as in claim 1, wherein said reactivation potential, reduction potential and test potential are sequentially potentiostatically applied to said test electrode.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method as in claim 1, wherein said reduction potential is controlled potentiodynamically and substantially linearly with time and wherein the transition from said reduction potential to said test potential is performed in the same manner.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method as in claim 1, wherein the test electrode is precharged to a predetermined load after the reactivation, thereby setting the reduction potential.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method according to claim 7, wherein said precharging of said test electrode to a predetermined load after the reactivation is performed galvanostatically.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method as per claim 1, wherein an ohmic voltage drop between said test electrode and a reference electrode is compensated so that a certain overcompensation is set up.