US4323876A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for reducing multiple events in a seismic record
Assignee: Texaco Inc
•
Filing: 1973-01-29
•
Granted: 1982-04-06
•
Expires: 1993-01-29
Abstract
Abstract A search is made down each trace of a seismic record at the approximate period of the multiple events to find a trace segment which most resembles a selected later segment of the same trace. An autocorrelation procedure is initially employed to determine the approximate period of the multiples and a crosscorrelation procedure is then employed to determine the time alignment of the two segments which produces maximum correspondence between the two segments. The degree of correspondence is determined by a "least-squares-fit" procedure. A portion of the earlier segment is subtracted from the later segment. The amount of the earlier segment to be subtracted is determined by the degree of correspondence. The procedure is incremented along the trace until the entire trace has been processed. Each trace is handled in the described manner until the entire record has been processed.
Inventors
- 👤 Alvin L. Parrack
- 👤 Delbert R. Lunsford
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 11:07
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V1/00; G01V1/28; G01V1/36; G01V1/364; G01V1/366; G01V2210/00; G01V2210/50; G01V2210/56
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 23
Claim 1
Independent Claim
88 words
A process for suppressing multiple events in seismic traces comprising the steps of: (a) comparing a first seismic trace segment with a second segment of the same trace to select that portion of the second segment which most closely resembles said first segment; (b) determining the degree of similarity between said selected portion and said first segment; and (c) extracting a part of said selected portion from said first portion, said part being a function of the degree of similarity between said selected portion and said first segment.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
88 words
A process for suppressing multiple events in seismic traces comprising the steps of: (a) comparing a first seismic trace segment with a second segment of the same trace to select that portion of the second segment which most closely resembles said first segment; (b) determining the degree of similarity between said selected portion and said first segment; and (c) extracting a part of said selected portion from said first portion, said part being a function of the degree of similarity between said selected portion and said first segment.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
27 words
A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said steps are repeated along said trace at increments substantially equal to one-half the length of said first segment.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
28 words
A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said first trace segment is spaced from said selected portion by the approximate period of the multiples to be suppressed.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
18 words
A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said second trace segment is longer than said first segment.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
65 words
A process as defined in claim 1 wherein: (a) a third segment of said trace, included as a portion of said first segment, and a fourth segment, included as a portion of said second segment, are employed to determine the degree of similarity between said third and fourth segments; and (b) said part is taken of said fourth segment and extracted from said third segment.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
27 words
A process as defined in claim 5 wherein said process is repeated along said trace at increments substantially equal to one-half the width of said third segment.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
24 words
A process as defined in claim 2 wherein said steps are repeated for the entire trace length of each of a plurality of traces.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
66 words
A process as defined in claim 5 further including the initial step of determining the approximate period of the multiple for a given trace by calculating the autocorrelation function for said given trace and determining the time spacing between the zero lag time of said autocorrelation function and the occurrence in said autocorrelation function of a significant peak or valley exceeding a predetermined absolute amplitude value.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
47 words
A process as defined in claim 8 wherein said autocorrelation function is calculated according to the relationship ##EQU4## where: f t =amplitude of the waveform of a seismic trace X at time t; f t+t' =amplitude of trace X at time t+t'; t'=incremental shift during each autocorrelation.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
101 words
A process as defined in claim 8 wherein: (a) said initial step is repeated for each new trace in a plurality of traces; (b) the approximate period of the multiples determined for each trace is employed to determine the approximate spacing between said zero lag time and said significant peak or valley in the autocorrelation function for the next trace in said plurality of traces to be processed; and (c) a search for the maximum absolute value of said autocorrelation function is made on both sides of said approximate spacing to determine the approximate period of the multiples to be suppressed.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
65 words
A process as defined in claim 5 further including the step of initially tapering said first and fourth segments with mathematical operators to cause the values for said first and fourth segments to start and finish with the same end values and to vary about a uniform function which extends uniformly away from said end values between the ends of said first and fourth segments.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
43 words
A process as defined in claim 1 further including the step of applying a positive value to said part for suppressing positive amplitude excursions in said trace and applying a negative value to said part for suppressing negative amplitude excursions in said trace.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
68 words
A process as defined in claim 9 wherein the step of selecting that portion of said second segment which most closely resembles said first segment is determined by the maximum value obtained from a crosscorrelation function ##EQU5## where: f t =the amplitude of the trace segment in said selected portion at time t; g t+t' =the amplitude of the trace segment in said first segment at time t+t'.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
100 words
A process as defined in claim 13 wherein the step of determining the degree of similarity between said selected portion and said first segment is determined by ##EQU6## where: K=the degree of similarity between said selected portion and said first segment; A1 i =the amplitude of the waveform of said fourth segment at a point i from the left end of said fourth segment; B1 i =the amplitude of the waveform of said third segment at a point i from the left edge of said third segment; i=the incremental spacing along the time axis at which amplitude values are taken.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
19 words
A process as defined in claim 14 including the step of limiting the upper and lower values of K.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
40 words
A process as defined in claim 15 wherein: (a) the upper limit for the value of K is K=1; (b) the lower limit for the value of K is K=0.0; and (c) said first portion is left unaltered when K=1.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
43 words
A process as defined in claim 14 further including the step of applying a positive value to said percentage for suppressing positive amplitude excursions in said trace and applying a negative value to said percentage for suppressing negative amplitude excursions in said trace.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
65 words
A process as defined in claim 14 further including the step of initially tapering said first and fourth segments with mathematical operators to cause the values for said first and fourth segments to start and finish with the same end values and to vary about a uniform function which extends uniformly away from said end values between the ends of said first and fourth segments.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
28 words
A process as defined in claim 18 wherein said mathematical operator is defined by F(t)=1/2 (1+Cosθ) -180°≦θ≦+180° where θ=the respective time intervals for said first and fourth segments.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
40 words
A process as defined in claim 19 wherein: (a) the upper limit for the value of K is K=1; (b) the lower limit for the value of K is K=0.0; and (c) said first portion is left unaltered when K=1.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
43 words
A process as defined in claim 20 further including the step of applying a positive value to said percentage for suppressing positive amplitude excursions in said trace and applying a negative value to said percentage for suppressing negative amplitude excursions in said trace.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
27 words
A process as defined in claim 21 wherein said process is repeated along said trace at increments substantially equal to one-half the width of said third segment.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3550074A
Cited
US3714621A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1985-04-05 | 1985-10-05 | 1986-04-06 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1989-04-05 | 1989-10-05 | 1990-04-06 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1993-04-05 | 1993-10-05 | 1994-04-06 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |