US4318100A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Automatic ground clutter rejection in weather pulse radar system
Assignee: Japan Radio Co Ltd
•
Filing: 1980-02-19
•
Granted: 1982-03-02
•
Expires: 2000-02-19
Abstract
Abstract In a weather radar system wherein echo signals are linear-detected from the waves received at the radar, each one of echo signals being compared with the later one to derive AC component, and the mean power of the weather echo estimated from the power of the AC component, the linear-detected echo signals are amplitude suppressed before compared. The amplitude suppression effectively removes the errors due to the fluctuation of ground clutter, and the variation of AC power of weather echo due to the existence of ground clutter. An amplitude suppressor is used which has an amplitude suppressing property expressed by Y=X k , where X is an amplitude of the input signal, Y is an amplitude of the output signal, and k is a constant (0<k<1). The value of k is advantageously 0.3-0.9, and, more advantageously 0.6-0.7. If the echo signals are obtained in a form of a logarithmic signal, an amplitude suppressor which has an input-output characteristic expressed by, for example, Y=10 kZ/20 (Z: amplitude of input signal, Y: amplitude of output signal) can be used.
Inventors
- 👤 Toshio Shimizu
- 👤 Atsushi Wakabayashi
- 👤 Shuichi Goto
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 07:40
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01S; G01S13/00; G01S13/02; G01S13/50; G01S13/52; G01S13/522; G01S13/88; G01S13/95; G01S13/951; Y; Y02; Y02A; Y02A90/00; Y02A90/10
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim
130 words
In a method for obtaining rain information from the mean power of the weather echo signal in a weather pulse radar system, which comprises steps of obtaining echo signals by detection of received waves in the radar system, comparing each one of successive echo signals with another later one which is spaced apart from the each one echo signal by a time period that the fluctuation of weather echo signals is independent to generate amplitude-difference signals, measuring the variance of the amplitude-difference signals, and calculating the mean power of the weather echo signal from the variance, the improvement comprising non-linearly amplitude suppressing the echo signals before the comparing step to more suppress echo signals of the greater amplitude, whereby the residual ground clutter in the amplitude-difference signals may be reduced.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
130 words
In a method for obtaining rain information from the mean power of the weather echo signal in a weather pulse radar system, which comprises steps of obtaining echo signals by detection of received waves in the radar system, comparing each one of successive echo signals with another later one which is spaced apart from the each one echo signal by a time period that the fluctuation of weather echo signals is independent to generate amplitude-difference signals, measuring the variance of the amplitude-difference signals, and calculating the mean power of the weather echo signal from the variance, the improvement comprising non-linearly amplitude suppressing the echo signals before the comparing step to more suppress echo signals of the greater amplitude, whereby the residual ground clutter in the amplitude-difference signals may be reduced.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
122 words
In a method for rejecting ground clutter from echo signals in a weather pulse radar system which comprises steps of linear-detecting the received wave in the radar system to obtain spaced detected pulse signals, and comparing each two detected pulse signals which are spaced apart from one another by a time period that the fluctuation of weather echo signals is independent to generate an amplitude-difference signals to eliminate the DC component of the echo signal thereby to obtain signals corresponding to the mean power of the weather echo, the improvement comprising non-linearly amplitude suppressing the echo signals before the comparing step to more suppress echo signals of the greater amplitude, whereby the residual ground clutter in the amplitude-difference signals may be reduced.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
122 words
In a method for rejecting ground clutter from echo signals in a weather pulse radar system which comprises steps of linear-detecting the received wave in the radar system to obtain spaced detected pulse signals, and comparing each two detected pulse signals which are spaced apart from one another by a time period that the fluctuation of weather echo signals is independent to generate an amplitude-difference signals to eliminate the DC component of the echo signal thereby to obtain signals corresponding to the mean power of the weather echo, the improvement comprising non-linearly amplitude suppressing the echo signals before the comparing step to more suppress echo signals of the greater amplitude, whereby the residual ground clutter in the amplitude-difference signals may be reduced.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
56 words
The method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the echo signals are non-linearly amplitude suppressed so that the amplitude Y of the suppressed signal may be expressed by the equation Y=X k , X being the amplitude of the echo signal to be suppressed, and k being less than 1 but greater than 0.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein k is 0.3 or more but 0.9 or less.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein k is 0.6 or more but 0.7 or less.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
164 words
In a weather radar system comprising a pulse radar transmitter and receiver device for detecting a weather echo and obtaining rain information from the mean power of the weather echo signals, the improvement comprising: means for non-linearly deriving echo signals including weather echo signals and/or ground clutter from the wave received at the radar receiver device, as signals that the greater amplitude of the echo signal components in the received waves is more suppressed; means coupled to said deriving means for comparing each one of successive echo signals from said deriving means with another later echo signal which is spaced apart from said echo signal by a given time period that fluctuation of weather echo signals is independent to generate an amplitude-difference signal; means coupled to said comparing means for unipolarizing the amplitude-difference signals; and means coupled to said unipolarizing means for averaging the successive output signals therefrom to provide averaged signals having an amplitude corresponding to the mean power of the weather echo.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
164 words
In a weather radar system comprising a pulse radar transmitter and receiver device for detecting a weather echo and obtaining rain information from the mean power of the weather echo signals, the improvement comprising: means for non-linearly deriving echo signals including weather echo signals and/or ground clutter from the wave received at the radar receiver device, as signals that the greater amplitude of the echo signal components in the received waves is more suppressed; means coupled to said deriving means for comparing each one of successive echo signals from said deriving means with another later echo signal which is spaced apart from said echo signal by a given time period that fluctuation of weather echo signals is independent to generate an amplitude-difference signal; means coupled to said comparing means for unipolarizing the amplitude-difference signals; and means coupled to said unipolarizing means for averaging the successive output signals therefrom to provide averaged signals having an amplitude corresponding to the mean power of the weather echo.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
22 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 6, wherein means for squaring the amplitude-difference signals are used in place of said unipolarizing means.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
63 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 6 or 7, wherein said deriving means comprises a linear-detector for linear-detecting the received wave, and an amplitude suppressor having an input and output amplitude response which is given by Y=X k , X being an amplitude of the input signal, Y being an amplitude of the output signal and k being an amplitude suppressing and 0<k<1.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
17 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 8, wherein k is 0.3 or more but 0.9 or less.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
17 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 8, wherein k is 0.6 or more but 0.7 or less.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
89 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 6 or 7, wherein said deriving means comprises a logarithmic amplifying detector having an input and output amplitude response of Z=20 log X, and an amplitude suppressor having an input and output amplitude response of Y=10 kZ/20 , where X is an amplitude of the echo signal included in the received wave, Y being an amplitude of the output of said amplitude suppressor, Z being an amplitude of the output of said logarithmic amplifying detector, and k being an amplitude suppressor and 0<k<1.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
17 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 11, wherein k is 0.3 or more but 0.9 or less.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
17 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 11, wherein k is 0.6 or more but 0.7 or less.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1985-03-01 | 1985-08-31 | 1986-03-02 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1989-03-01 | 1989-08-31 | 1990-03-02 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1993-03-01 | 1993-08-31 | 1994-03-02 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |