US4183657A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Dynamic reference for an image quality control system
Assignee: International Business Machines Corp
•
Filing: 1978-04-10
•
Granted: 1980-01-15
•
Expires: 1998-04-10
Abstract
Abstract A system for checking copy quality variables within the image area of an electrophotographic machine. During a test cycle, quality is checked by producing sample test areas within the photoconductor image area ordinarily used for producing copies. Reflectance measurements are made on the sample test areas and compared to a dynamically floating reference achieved by a reflectance measurement from a cleaned portion of the photoconductor within the image area. The testing circuit is balanced so that the same reflectance voltage should be generated whether the single reflectivity-sensing device is viewing a sample test area or a cleaned reference area. The system checks for quality variables such as toner concentration, image voltage and an abnormally low reflectance photoconductor and provides a partial check on its own fault-free condition during periods when it is not in use.
Inventors
- 👤 Larry M. Ernst
- 👤 Steven D. Seigal
- 👤 George W. Van Cleave
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 14:07
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03G; G03G15/00; G03G15/50; G03G15/5033; G03G15/5037; G03G2215/00; G03G2215/00025; G03G2215/00029; G03G2215/00033; G03G2215/00037; G03G2215/00042
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
147 words
A method for checking quality variables in an electrophotographic reproducing machine including the steps of: (1) adjusting the value of a sensed reference signal and the value of a sensed sample signal to be approximately equal for correct quality condition; (2) using an illumination-sensing means to produce said sensed reference signal and said sensed sample signal, both of said signals thereby representing variable conditions within said machine; (3) comparing said reference signal and said sample signal to obtain a ratio of the reference and sample signals to produce an output signal indicative of the quality variable; and (4) repeating steps 2-3 each time a quality check is made, whereby variable conditions within said machine and within the components of the checking apparatus appear within the sensed reference signal and the sensed sample signal in relatively equal proportions, thus producing an output signal which varies only with quality.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
147 words
A method for checking quality variables in an electrophotographic reproducing machine including the steps of: (1) adjusting the value of a sensed reference signal and the value of a sensed sample signal to be approximately equal for correct quality condition; (2) using an illumination-sensing means to produce said sensed reference signal and said sensed sample signal, both of said signals thereby representing variable conditions within said machine; (3) comparing said reference signal and said sample signal to obtain a ratio of the reference and sample signals to produce an output signal indicative of the quality variable; and (4) repeating steps 2-3 each time a quality check is made, whereby variable conditions within said machine and within the components of the checking apparatus appear within the sensed reference signal and the sensed sample signal in relatively equal proportions, thus producing an output signal which varies only with quality.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
72 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said step of adjusting involves an adjustment of the illumination output of light source means used as the source of illumination for exciting said sensing means so that said light source means produces a first intensity output when the reference signal is produced and a second intensity output when the sample signal is produced so that said reference signal and said sample signal may be equalized.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 2 wherein said reference signal and said sample signal are obtained by sensing illumination reflected from the area of the photoconductive surface used at other times for producing document images.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
170 words
In an electrophotographic copier machine wherein images of documents to be copied are produced on photoreceptive material, said machine including a developer to apply toner to said images, light reflectance sensing means to view said photoreceptive material, a quality checking method including the steps of: (1) producing a charged test area and a discharged reference test area on said photoreceptive material; (2) developing said charged test area; (3) using an illumination-sensing means to measure the reflectivity of said discharged reference test area to establish a reference signal indicative of clean photoconductor; (4) using the identical sensing means to measure the reflectivity of the developed test area to establish a sample signal indicative of the quality of a toned image; (5) comparing said reference signal to said sample signal to thereby provide an output signal indicative of quality; (6) adjusting the value of said reference and sample signals until said output signal is approximately zero for correct quality conditions; and (7) repeating steps 1-6 each time a quality check is made.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
170 words
In an electrophotographic copier machine wherein images of documents to be copied are produced on photoreceptive material, said machine including a developer to apply toner to said images, light reflectance sensing means to view said photoreceptive material, a quality checking method including the steps of: (1) producing a charged test area and a discharged reference test area on said photoreceptive material; (2) developing said charged test area; (3) using an illumination-sensing means to measure the reflectivity of said discharged reference test area to establish a reference signal indicative of clean photoconductor; (4) using the identical sensing means to measure the reflectivity of the developed test area to establish a sample signal indicative of the quality of a toned image; (5) comparing said reference signal to said sample signal to thereby provide an output signal indicative of quality; (6) adjusting the value of said reference and sample signals until said output signal is approximately zero for correct quality conditions; and (7) repeating steps 1-6 each time a quality check is made.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said reference test area and said developed test area are located within the area of the photoreceptive material used for document reproduction.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
62 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said step of adjusting involves an adjustment of the illumination output of light source means used as the source of illumination for the reflectivity measurements so that said light source means produces a higher intensity output when the toned sample signal measurement is produced and a lower intensity output when the reference signal measurement is produced.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
161 words
Quality control test apparatus for an electrophotographic machine comprising: a photoconductive material; charge corona means for charging said photoconductive material; erase means for discharging a portion of said photoconductive material to establish a discharged test area and a charged test area for a toned sample; developing means for placing toner on said charged test area to provide said toned sample; single light-sensitive means for receiving light rays reflected from said discharged test area to establish a reference signal indicative of the light reflecting capability of clean photoconductive material, and for receiving light rays reflected from said toned sample to establish a signal indicative of the light reflecting capability of the developed test area; comparator means for comparing the sensed reference signal and the sensed toned sample signal to establish an output signal indicative of quality; and adjusting means for adjusting the sensed reference signal and the sensed toned sample signal to approximately equal each other when the quality level is correct.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
161 words
Quality control test apparatus for an electrophotographic machine comprising: a photoconductive material; charge corona means for charging said photoconductive material; erase means for discharging a portion of said photoconductive material to establish a discharged test area and a charged test area for a toned sample; developing means for placing toner on said charged test area to provide said toned sample; single light-sensitive means for receiving light rays reflected from said discharged test area to establish a reference signal indicative of the light reflecting capability of clean photoconductive material, and for receiving light rays reflected from said toned sample to establish a signal indicative of the light reflecting capability of the developed test area; comparator means for comparing the sensed reference signal and the sensed toned sample signal to establish an output signal indicative of quality; and adjusting means for adjusting the sensed reference signal and the sensed toned sample signal to approximately equal each other when the quality level is correct.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
41 words
The test apparatus of claim 7 wherein said adjusting means includes a light source energized to produce a relatively low level of light for sensing the reference signal and a relatively high level of light for sensing the toned sample signal.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
29 words
The test apparatus of claim 8 wherein said charged test area and said discharged test area are located within the area of the photoconductive material used for document reproduction.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2956487A
Cited
US3094049A
Cited
US3348521A
Cited
US3348522A
Cited
US3354802A
Cited
US3348523A
Cited
US3640615A
Cited
US3647295A
Cited
US3611982A
Cited
US3647293A
Cited
US3647293B1
Cited
US3783818A
Cited
US3719169A
Cited
US3780299A
Cited
US3719165A
Cited
US3850662A
Cited
US3700323A
Cited
US3724942A
Cited
US3928764A
Cited
US3778146A
Cited
US3901593A
Cited
US3911865A
Cited
US3801196A
Cited
US3914045A
Cited
US3927641A
Cited
US3926338A
Cited
US3911861A
Cited
US3834807A
Cited
US3893414A
Cited
US4026643A
Cited
US4082445A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1983-01-14 | 1983-07-16 | 1984-01-15 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1987-01-14 | 1987-07-16 | 1988-01-15 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1991-01-14 | 1991-07-16 | 1992-01-15 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |