US4178095A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Abnormally low reflectance photoconductor sensing system
Assignee: International Business Machines Corp
•
Filing: 1978-04-10
•
Granted: 1979-12-11
•
Expires: 1998-04-10
Abstract
Abstract A system for checking copy quality variables within the image area of an electrophotographic machine. During a test cycle, quality is checked by producing sample test areas within the photoconductor image area ordinarily used for producing copies. Reflectance measurements are made on the sample test areas and compared to a dynamically floating reference achieved by a reflectance measurement from a cleaned portion within the image area of the photoconductor. The testing circuit is balanced so that the same reflectance voltage should be generated whether the single reflectivity-sensing device is viewing a sample test area or a cleaned reference area. The system checks for quality variables such as toner concentration, image voltage, and an abnormally low reflectance photoconductor and provides a partial check on its own fault-free condition during periods when it is not in use.
Inventors
- 👤 James R. Champion
- 👤 Steven D. Seigal
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 10:07
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03G; G03G15/00; G03G15/50; G03G15/5033; G03G15/5037; G03G2215/00; G03G2215/00025; G03G2215/00029; G03G2215/00033; G03G2215/00037; G03G2215/00042
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 5
Claim 1
Independent Claim
201 words
A method of checking for an abnormally dark photoconductor condition during a test cycle in an electrophotographic copier machine by utilizing test apparatus for making quality control checks, said apparatus including a photoconductor upon which images of documents to be copied are produced, a developer for applying toner to said images, light reflectance sensing means to view said photoconductor, and two output signals, one indicative of quality low and the other indicative of quality extra low, said method including the steps of: (1) forcing a condition in said quality control apparatus to provide a continuing output signal indicative of quality extra low but not indicative of quality low during document reproduction machine cycles when said quality control checks are not being taken; (2) providing a test cycle for said quality control checks wherein a reference signal is produced by viewing a clean portion of said photoconductor normally used for document reproductions; (3) interrupting the forced condition of said quality control apparatus when said reference signal is produced in a magnitude indicative of clear photoconductor; and (4) providing no interruption of said forced condition at step 3 when said reference signal is produced in a low magnitude indicative of abnormally dark photoconductor.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
201 words
A method of checking for an abnormally dark photoconductor condition during a test cycle in an electrophotographic copier machine by utilizing test apparatus for making quality control checks, said apparatus including a photoconductor upon which images of documents to be copied are produced, a developer for applying toner to said images, light reflectance sensing means to view said photoconductor, and two output signals, one indicative of quality low and the other indicative of quality extra low, said method including the steps of: (1) forcing a condition in said quality control apparatus to provide a continuing output signal indicative of quality extra low but not indicative of quality low during document reproduction machine cycles when said quality control checks are not being taken; (2) providing a test cycle for said quality control checks wherein a reference signal is produced by viewing a clean portion of said photoconductor normally used for document reproductions; (3) interrupting the forced condition of said quality control apparatus when said reference signal is produced in a magnitude indicative of clear photoconductor; and (4) providing no interruption of said forced condition at step 3 when said reference signal is produced in a low magnitude indicative of abnormally dark photoconductor.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
41 words
In the method of claim 1, utilizing said continuing output signal for checking the proper operation of the quality control apparatus during document reproduction machine cycles by providing an interruption in the forced condition at any time other than step 3.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
117 words
Copier control apparatus comprising: a photoconductor; means operable to establish a discharged test area and a charged test area, both test areas within the area of said photoconductor normally used for document reproduction; a developer operable to present toner to said charged test area to thereby normally tone said charged test area; light reflectance sensing means operable to compare light reflected from said discharged test area to that reflected from said charged test area, to thereby provide an output signal indicative of the quality of the test area; and means including said light reflectance means operable to sense abnormally low light reflectance from said discharged area, to thereby provide an output signal indicative of abnormally dark photoconductor.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
117 words
Copier control apparatus comprising: a photoconductor; means operable to establish a discharged test area and a charged test area, both test areas within the area of said photoconductor normally used for document reproduction; a developer operable to present toner to said charged test area to thereby normally tone said charged test area; light reflectance sensing means operable to compare light reflected from said discharged test area to that reflected from said charged test area, to thereby provide an output signal indicative of the quality of the test area; and means including said light reflectance means operable to sense abnormally low light reflectance from said discharged area, to thereby provide an output signal indicative of abnormally dark photoconductor.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2956487A
Cited
US3094049A
Cited
US3348521A
Cited
US3348522A
Cited
US3354802A
Cited
US3348523A
Cited
US3640615A
Cited
US3647295A
Cited
US3611982A
Cited
US3647293A
Cited
US3647293B1
Cited
US3783818A
Cited
US3719169A
Cited
US3780299A
Cited
US3719165A
Cited
US3850662A
Cited
US3700323A
Cited
US3724942A
Cited
US3928764A
Cited
US3778146A
Cited
US3901593A
Cited
US3911865A
Cited
US3801196A
Cited
US3914045A
Cited
US3927641A
Cited
US3926338A
Cited
US3911861A
Cited
US3834807A
Cited
US3893414A
Cited
US4026643A
Cited
US4082445A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1982-12-10 | 1983-06-11 | 1983-12-11 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1986-12-10 | 1987-06-11 | 1987-12-11 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1990-12-10 | 1991-06-11 | 1991-12-11 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |