US4174179A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Continuous feed holographic correlator for randomly oriented workpieces
Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1977-08-24
•
Granted: 1979-11-13
•
Expires: 1997-08-24
Abstract
Abstract A method and apparatus to optically control mass produced articles by a holographic correlator. The articles are continuously moved through an input beam of the holographic correlator. The correlator employs a holographic filter having a plurality of Fourier spectra recorded thereon, which are spatially separated but overlapping and which correspond to different orientations of the reference specimen. During the translation of the object through the input beam, the beam is reflected so that all spectra are addressed through the holographic filter. The output correlation spot is detected through a diaphragm having a slit-form aperture. This apparatus and the method it employs does not depend on the orientation between the article and the holographic filter, thereby providing accurate results at high speeds.
Inventors
- 👤 Theodor Tschudi
- 👤 Guy Indebetouw
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 07:59
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06V; G06V10/00; G06V10/88
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
131 words
A method comparing an object with a reference specimen by means of a coherent optical multichannel correlator employing a coherent input light beam and an output beam passing through a filter, said method comprising the steps of: (a) producing a holographic filter containing a spatially distinct plurality of images each representing characteristic properties of the referenece specimen in different specimen orientations; (b) using said holographic filter as the filter in the correlator; (c) translationally moving the object to be compared through the coherent input light beam of the correlator; (d) detecting and measuring the intensity of the output beam of the correlator through a slit diaphragm; and (e) sorting the object in dependence upon the maximum value of the intensity measured during said translational movement of the object to be compared.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
131 words
A method comparing an object with a reference specimen by means of a coherent optical multichannel correlator employing a coherent input light beam and an output beam passing through a filter, said method comprising the steps of: (a) producing a holographic filter containing a spatially distinct plurality of images each representing characteristic properties of the referenece specimen in different specimen orientations; (b) using said holographic filter as the filter in the correlator; (c) translationally moving the object to be compared through the coherent input light beam of the correlator; (d) detecting and measuring the intensity of the output beam of the correlator through a slit diaphragm; and (e) sorting the object in dependence upon the maximum value of the intensity measured during said translational movement of the object to be compared.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the plurality of images such represents characteristic properties of the reference specimen in rotationally different specimen orientations about an axis parallel to the optical axis of the correlator.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the step of producing the holographic filter further comprises the steps of: (a) analytically computing an interference pattern of a coherent light beam with the Fourier spectra of the reference specimen in different specimen orientations; and (b) manufacturing a transparency according to said interference pattern.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
214 words
An apparatus for comparing objects with a reference specimen comprising: (a) a coherent optical multichannel correlator including a holographic filter containing a spatially distinct plurality of images each representing characteristic properties of the reference specimen in different specimen orientations; (b) a coherent light source supplying said correlator with a coherent input light beam which is directed to the object to be compared and results in a diffracted beam; (c) a first lens transforming the diffracted beam and directing the diffracted beam toward the holographic filter of said correlator. (d) a deflecting means which deflects with a conical-rotating movement the coherent input light beam of said coherent light source through a small, preset angle; (e) means for translatioally moving the object to be compared through said deflected light beam; (f) a second transformation lens disposed in the path of the diffracted light beam after the diffracted light beam has passed through the holographic filter; (g) a light-sensitive sensor having a light-sensitive surface of slit form disposed on a focal plane of said second transformation lens; and (h) said sensor supplying an output signal corresponding to a light intensity impinging upon the sensitive surface of said light-sensitive sensor whereby the output signal corresponds to the comparison between the object to be compared and the reference specimen.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
214 words
An apparatus for comparing objects with a reference specimen comprising: (a) a coherent optical multichannel correlator including a holographic filter containing a spatially distinct plurality of images each representing characteristic properties of the reference specimen in different specimen orientations; (b) a coherent light source supplying said correlator with a coherent input light beam which is directed to the object to be compared and results in a diffracted beam; (c) a first lens transforming the diffracted beam and directing the diffracted beam toward the holographic filter of said correlator. (d) a deflecting means which deflects with a conical-rotating movement the coherent input light beam of said coherent light source through a small, preset angle; (e) means for translatioally moving the object to be compared through said deflected light beam; (f) a second transformation lens disposed in the path of the diffracted light beam after the diffracted light beam has passed through the holographic filter; (g) a light-sensitive sensor having a light-sensitive surface of slit form disposed on a focal plane of said second transformation lens; and (h) said sensor supplying an output signal corresponding to a light intensity impinging upon the sensitive surface of said light-sensitive sensor whereby the output signal corresponds to the comparison between the object to be compared and the reference specimen.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
53 words
An apparatus according to claim 4 wherein said means for translationally moving said object comprises an object support which is transparent to the light beam and which is situated on a platen rotating about an axis parallel to an axis of a deflection cone formed by the conical-rotating movement of said light beam.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
16 words
An apparatus according to claim 4 wherein said holographic filter is a successively exposed photographic filter.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
12 words
An apparatus according to claim 4 wherein said holographic filter is synthesized.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
23 words
An apparatus according to claim 4 wherein said light-sensitive sensor consists of a light-sensitive element and a preceding diaphragm having a slit-form aperture.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
17 words
An apparatus according to claim 4 wherein the width of said slit-form is less than 0.1 mm.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
24 words
An apparatus according to claim 4 wherein the ratio of length to width of said slit-form is of the order of magnitude of 20:1.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
22 words
An apparatus according to claim 4 wherein the number of said plurality of images is greater than 4 and less than 24.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
17 words
An apparatus according to claim 8 wherein the width of said slit-form is less than 0.1 mm.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
24 words
An apparatus according to claim 8 wherein the ratio of length to width of said slit-form is of the order of magnitude of 20:1.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1982-11-12 | 1983-05-14 | 1983-11-13 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1986-11-12 | 1987-05-14 | 1987-11-13 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1990-11-12 | 1991-05-14 | 1991-11-13 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |