US4138291A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Microbiological methods
Assignee: Agroferm AG
•
Filing: 1977-08-08
•
Granted: 1979-02-06
•
Expires: 1997-08-08
Abstract
Abstract The invention relates to a method of obtaining selected bacterial strains which can convert an assimilable carbon source selected from carbohydrates, methanol, ethanol, glycerin, carbon dioxide and spent lyes from caprolactam synthesis into poly-(D-3-hydroxybutyric acid), selected bacterial strains obtained thereby and their use in producing poly-(D-3-hydroxybutyric acid).
Inventors
- 👤 Robert M. Lafferty
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 09:15
CPC Classifications
C; C12; C12P; C12P7/00; C12P7/62; C12P7/625; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S435/00; Y10S435/8215; Y10S435/822; Y10S435/85
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 27
Claim 1
Independent Claim
111 words
A method of obtaining selected bacterial strains which, under any growth conditions, can substantially convert an assimilable carbon source selected from carbohydrates, methanol, ethanol, glycerin, carbon dioxide and spent lyes from caprolactam synthesis containing monocarboxylic and dicarboxylic acids into poly-(D-3-hydroxybutyric acid) which method comprises selecting from poly-(D-3-hydroxybutyric acid)- producing bacterial strains those which form colonies of milky-white appearance on an agar nutrient medium, said colonies having dome-shaped elevations above the agar surface or attaining large dimensions; breeding said selected bacterial strains on constantly increasing concentrations of said assimilable carbon source; and subjecting said bacterial strains at least once to the action of mutagenic agents whereby the desired bacterial strains are obtained.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
111 words
A method of obtaining selected bacterial strains which, under any growth conditions, can substantially convert an assimilable carbon source selected from carbohydrates, methanol, ethanol, glycerin, carbon dioxide and spent lyes from caprolactam synthesis containing monocarboxylic and dicarboxylic acids into poly-(D-3-hydroxybutyric acid) which method comprises selecting from poly-(D-3-hydroxybutyric acid)- producing bacterial strains those which form colonies of milky-white appearance on an agar nutrient medium, said colonies having dome-shaped elevations above the agar surface or attaining large dimensions; breeding said selected bacterial strains on constantly increasing concentrations of said assimilable carbon source; and subjecting said bacterial strains at least once to the action of mutagenic agents whereby the desired bacterial strains are obtained.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
65 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the selected bacterial strains are subjected to one of the following selection procedures: (a) selection of bacterial strains having the lowest specific gravity under conditions which hinder or do not help the microbiological synthesis of poly- (D-3-hydroxybutyric acid), (b) selection of bacterial strains having the strongest colouring after brief flooding with a solution of Sudan black B.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein, from the selected bacterial strains, those are further selected which convert a higher proportion of the carbon source into poly-(D-3-hydroxybutyric acid) than the original strain.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
34 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein, from the selected bacterial strains, those are further selected which do not or only slightly depolymerise poly-(D-3-hydroxybutyric acid) or which do not utilise monomeric D-3-hydroxybutyric acid.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
70 words
A method as claimed in claim 4 wherein the further selection comprises selecting those strains which form colonies of milky-white appearance of approximately 1/4 to 1 mm diameter when cultured on an agar nutrient medium containing, as the carbon source, a mixture consisting essentially of a greatly predominant amount of DL-3-hydroxybutyric acid in combination with a minor amount of assimilable carbohydrate as compared to the amount of said DL-3-hydroxybutyric acid.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
73 words
A method of using the selected bacterial strains obtained by the method according to claim 1 for producing poly-(D-3-hydroxybutyric acid), which comprises culturing said bacterial strains in an aqueous nutrient medium containing an assimilable carbon source selected from carbohydrates, methanol, ethanol, glycerin, carbon dioxide and spent lyes from caprolactam synthesis containing monocarboxylic and dicarboxylic acids, an assimilable nitrogen source and trace elements, and isolating the poly-(D-3-hydroxybutyric acid) thus produced from the culture medium.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
15 words
A method as claimed in claim 6 wherein the culturing is effected under submerged conditions.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
25 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said bacterial strains are subjected at least once before selection to the action of said mutagenic agents.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
25 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said bacterial strains are subjected at least once after selection to the action of said mutagenic agents.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
25 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said bacterial strains are subjected at least once during selection to the action of said mutagenic agents.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
25 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said bacterial strains are subjected at least once before breeding to the action of said mutagenic agents.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
25 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said bacterial strains are subjected at least once after breeding to the action of said mutagenic agents.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
25 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said bacterial strains are subjected at least once during breeding to the action of said mutagenic agents.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said bacterial strains are subjected at least once before said selection and at least once before said breeding to the action of said mutagenic agents.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said bacterial strains are subjected at least once before said selection and at least once after said breeding to the action of said mutagenic agents.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said bacterial strains are subjected at least once before said selection and at least once during said breeding to the action of said mutagenic agents.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said bacterial strains are subjected at least once after said selection and at least once before said breeding to the action of said mutagenic agents.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said bacterial strains are subjected at least once after said selection and at least once after said breeding to the action of said mutagenic agents.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said bacterial strains are subjected at least once after said selection and at least once during said breeding to the action of said mutagenic agents.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said bacterial strains are subjected at least once during said selection and at least once before said breeding to the action of said mutagenic agents.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said bacterial strains are subjected at least once during said selection and at least once after said breeding to the action of said mutagenic agents.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said bacterial strains are subjected at least once during said selection and at least once during said breeding to the action of said mutagenic agents.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
73 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the selected bacterial strains are subjected to both of the following selection procedures, which procedures may be carried out in optional order: (a) selection of bacterial strains having the lowest specific gravity under conditions which hinder or do not help the microbiological synthesis of poly-(D-3-hydroxybutyric acid), (b) selection of bacterial strains having the strongest colouring after brief flooding with a solution of Sudan black B.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
38 words
A method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the further selection comprises selecting those strains which cannot grow on 3-hydroxybutyric acid, but thrive on an assimilable carbohydrate and have a milky-white appearance when cultured on an agar medium.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
15 words
A method as claimed in claim 24, wherein said assimilable carboyhdrate is glucose or fructose.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
20 words
A method as claimed in claim 25, wherein 0.008% glucose or fructose is used in combination with 2% sodium DL-3-hydroxybutyrate.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1982-02-05 | 1982-08-07 | 1983-02-06 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1986-02-05 | 1986-08-07 | 1987-02-06 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1990-02-05 | 1990-08-07 | 1991-02-06 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |