US4030141A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Multi-function control system for an artificial upper-extremity prosthesis for above-elbow amputees
Assignee: United States Department of Veterans Affairs
•
Filing: 1976-02-09
•
Granted: 1977-06-21
•
Expires: 1996-02-09
Abstract
Abstract This invention relates to an improved EMG-based method for actuating a prosthetic appliance wherein a single pair of electrodes may be used to actuate several artificial limb movements by way of sampling and repeatedly resampling substantially the entire time function of the myoelectric signal as it appears on the limb stump over a period so short that the signal remains quasi-stationary, comparing a minimum number of parameters of such signals with a range of values of these same parameters stored within the data bank of a microcomputer, and actuating one or more functions of a prosthetic appliance whenever the current data for the sampled parameters all falls within a preselected domain chosen on the basis of the historical data. This invention also encompasses the apparatus for using the EMG signals developed by the patient in the stump for controlling the movements of a prosthetic appliance which comprise means connected to process the EMG signals so as to differentiate between the various functions to be performed thereby based upon a minimum number of parameters of said signals, means for storing historical data concerning the range of values said parameters vary over for each function, means for repeatedly sampling current data on said parameters and comparing same with the stored data during a brief time interval, and means operative to initiate one or more functions whenever the current data on the chosen parameters falls within an arbitrary domain chosen on the basis of said historical data.
Inventors
- 👤 Daniel Graupe
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 12:26
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61F; A61F2/00; A61F2/50; A61F2/68; A61F2/70; A61F2/72; A61F2002/704
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 33
Claim 1
Independent Claim
248 words
For use in combination with an electrically-operated prosthetic appliance for replacing a missing limb, a control circuit responsive to input signals supplied thereto for operating said appliance and a set of at least two electrodes adapted to receive electromyographic (EMG) signals from the stump of the missing limb when fastened thereto, the subcombination for processing said EMG signal preparatory to delivering same to said control circuit which comprises: data processing means for analyzing the EMG signal so as to reduce it to a near minimum number of linear time series model parameters which are effective to differentiate each of several functions of the missing limb from all other functions thereof, data acquisition means for collecting and storing historical data produced by the amputee at the electrodes relative to the maximum and minimum values of said linear time series model parameters for each limb function to be performed by the prosthesis, comparison measuring means for repeatedly sampling current data on said linear times series model parameters produced by the amputee at the electrodes and comparing said current data with a set of predetermined values therefor chosen on the basis of said historical data, and means responsive to the comparison measuring means operative during each sampling interval to deliver one or more output signals to the control circuit effective to initiate or continue actuation of only that function or those functions of the prosthesis wherein the sampled data falls within the set of unique values chosen for a particular function.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
248 words
For use in combination with an electrically-operated prosthetic appliance for replacing a missing limb, a control circuit responsive to input signals supplied thereto for operating said appliance and a set of at least two electrodes adapted to receive electromyographic (EMG) signals from the stump of the missing limb when fastened thereto, the subcombination for processing said EMG signal preparatory to delivering same to said control circuit which comprises: data processing means for analyzing the EMG signal so as to reduce it to a near minimum number of linear time series model parameters which are effective to differentiate each of several functions of the missing limb from all other functions thereof, data acquisition means for collecting and storing historical data produced by the amputee at the electrodes relative to the maximum and minimum values of said linear time series model parameters for each limb function to be performed by the prosthesis, comparison measuring means for repeatedly sampling current data on said linear times series model parameters produced by the amputee at the electrodes and comparing said current data with a set of predetermined values therefor chosen on the basis of said historical data, and means responsive to the comparison measuring means operative during each sampling interval to deliver one or more output signals to the control circuit effective to initiate or continue actuation of only that function or those functions of the prosthesis wherein the sampled data falls within the set of unique values chosen for a particular function.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
28 words
The subcombination as set forth in claim 1 wherein the linear time series parameters are parameters of an autoregressive (AR) model of an order no larger than eight.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
25 words
The subcombination as set forth in claim 1 wherein the linear time series parameters are parameters of a near minimum autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
93 words
The subcombination as set forth in claim 1 for use in combination with at least two sets of electrodes placed at different locations wherein the data acquisition means includes sorting means for storing data on the EMG signal according to the location from which it was received, in which independent data processing means connected in parallel with one another are provided for processing data on the EMG signal from each electrode location, and in which separate comparison measuring means are employed for each data processing means and set of electrodes feeding data thereto.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
46 words
The subcombination as set forth in claim 1 wherein means comprising a filter receives the signals from the electrodes and preprocesses same to eliminate substantially all frequencies outside the range of an EMG signal preparatory to delivering the signal thus filtered to the data processing means.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
22 words
The subcombination as set forth in claim 1 wherein the comparison measuring means repeatedly resamples the EMG signals approximately every 0.2 seconds.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
15 words
The subcombination of claim 1 wherein the number of parameters is not less than three.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
16 words
The subcombination of claim 1 wherein the number of parameters lies between three and approximately eight.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
20 words
The subcombination as set forth in claim 2 wherein the AR model is produced using a near convergent identification algorithm.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
15 words
The subcombination of claim 2 wherein the number of parameters is not less than three.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
16 words
The subcombination of claim 2 wherein the number of parameters lies between three and approximately eight.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
20 words
The subcombination as set forth in claim 3 wherein the ARMA model is produced using a near convergent identification algorithm.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
22 words
The subcombination of claim 5 wherein the filter eliminates all frequencies below approximately 1.5 Hz and above approximately 1.5 K Hz Herz.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
18 words
The subcombination as set forth in claim 9 wherein the identification algorithm is of the least squares type.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
18 words
The subcombination as set forth in claim 9 wherein the identification algorithm is of the moving average type.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
18 words
The subcombination as set forth in claim 12 wherein the identification algorithm is of the least squares type.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
18 words
The subcombination as set forth in claim 12 wherein the identification algorithm is of the moving average type.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
189 words
The improved method for controlling the operating of an electrically-powered prosthetic appliance replacing a missing limb which comprises the steps of: picking up electromyographic (EMG) signals from at least one location on the stump of the missing limb, processing the signals thus received so as to reduce same to near minimum number of linear time series model parameters effective to differentiate each of the several functions performed by the missing limb from each other function thereof, collecting historical reference data developed by the amputee relative to maximum and minimum values of said parameters for each function to be performed by the prosthesis, choosing a set of unique values of said parameters for each function to be performed on the basis of the historical data thus collected and storing said unique values, repeatedly sampling current data on said parameters while comparing same with the unique sets of preselected values stored for each function, and initiating or continuing that function or those functions of the prosthesis during the sampling period when and only when the current parameter values fall within one or more of said unique sets of values chosen therefor.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
189 words
The improved method for controlling the operating of an electrically-powered prosthetic appliance replacing a missing limb which comprises the steps of: picking up electromyographic (EMG) signals from at least one location on the stump of the missing limb, processing the signals thus received so as to reduce same to near minimum number of linear time series model parameters effective to differentiate each of the several functions performed by the missing limb from each other function thereof, collecting historical reference data developed by the amputee relative to maximum and minimum values of said parameters for each function to be performed by the prosthesis, choosing a set of unique values of said parameters for each function to be performed on the basis of the historical data thus collected and storing said unique values, repeatedly sampling current data on said parameters while comparing same with the unique sets of preselected values stored for each function, and initiating or continuing that function or those functions of the prosthesis during the sampling period when and only when the current parameter values fall within one or more of said unique sets of values chosen therefor.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method as set forth in claim 18 in which the signals are processed to reduce them to autoregressive (AR) parameters of an order no longer than eight.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method as set forth in claim 18 in which the EMG signals are processed to reduce them to a near minimum number of autoregressive moving average (ARMA) parameters.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method as set forth in claim 18 in which the current data on the identified parameters is repeatedly sampled over a period not to exceed that during which a linear time series model of the EMG signal remains substantially stationary.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method as set forth in claim 18 in which the current data on the identified parameters is repeatedly sampled over a period of approximately 0.2 seconds.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
61 words
The method as set forth in claim 18 in which: the EMG signals are picked up from at least two separate locations on the stump, current data and historical data from each electrode location is kept separate from the corresponding data taken from other electrode locations, and data from different electrode locations is used to control different functions of the prosthesis.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method as set forth in claim 18 which includes the step of filtering the incoming EMG signals to eliminate all frequencies outside the normal range thereof.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method as set forth in claim 18 which includes the steps of making an autoregressive (AR) model of the incoming EMG signal and processing same with an identification algorithm which is nearly convergent.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method as set forth in claim 18 which includes the steps of making an autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model of the incoming EMG signal and processing same with an identification algorithm which is nearly convergent.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method as set forth in claim 18 wherein the signals are processed to reduce the number thereof to at least three but no more than eight.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method as set forth in claim 25 in which the identification algorithm is of the least squares type.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method as set forth in claim 25 in which the identification algorithm is of the sequential learning type.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method as set forth in claim 26 in which the identification algorithm is of the least squares type.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method as set forth in claim 26 in which the identification algorithm is of the sequential learning type.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3491378A
Cited
US3735425A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1980-06-20 | 1980-12-20 | 1981-06-21 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1984-06-20 | 1984-12-20 | 1985-06-21 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1988-06-20 | 1988-12-20 | 1989-06-21 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |