US3987281A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of radiation therapy treatment planning
Assignee: United States Department of Health and Human Services
•
Filing: 1974-07-29
•
Granted: 1976-10-19
•
Expires: 1994-07-29
Abstract
Abstract A technique of radiation therapy treatment planning designed to allow the assignment of dosage limits directly to chosen points in the computer-displayed cross-section of the patient. These dosage limits are used as constraints in a linear programming attempt to solve for beam strengths, minimizing integral dosage. If a feasible plan exists, the optimized plan will be displayed for approval as an isodose pattern. If there is no feasible plan, the operator/therapist can designate some of the point dosage constraints as "relaxed." Linear programming will then optimize for minimum deviation at the relaxed points. This process can be iterated and new points selected until an acceptable plan is realized. In this manner the plan is optimized for uniformity as well as overall low dosage.
Inventors
- 👤 Louis Hodes
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 17:05
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61N; A61N5/00; A61N5/10; A61N5/103; A61N5/1031; G; G16; G16H; G16H50/00; G16H50/50
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 7
Claim 1
Independent Claim
255 words
An improved method of radiation therapy treatment planning enabling the production and display of a desirable radiation dosage distribution from a predetermined number and arrangement of simulated radiation sources, said method comprising the steps of: electronically plotting a simulation of the contour of the areas of interest of the patient desired to be treated; selecting a predetermined number of simulated sources of radiation of known beam sizes and wedges and electronically orienting and directing said simulated radiation sources about the patient contour; setting radiation dosage limits at a plurality of points within the patient contour; automatically determining the beam strength for each of the predetermined number of oriented sources of simulated radiation which will result in radiation dosages within the set limits at the points within the patient contour; manually intervening by readjusting certain of the radiation dosage limits in the patient contour should the previous step fail to yield a beam strength dosage distribution resulting in radiation dosages within the initially set limits at the points within the patient contour; automatically redetermining the beam strength for each of the predetermined number of oriented sources of simulated radiation which will result in radiation dosages within the readjusted limits at the points within the patient contour; repeating the preceeding two steps until the radiation dosages fall within the readjusted limits; and displaying the resulting isodose pattern; whereafter radiation therapy to the areas of interest of the patient can be effected with the same oriented and predetermined number of actual radiation sources having the determined beam strengths.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
255 words
An improved method of radiation therapy treatment planning enabling the production and display of a desirable radiation dosage distribution from a predetermined number and arrangement of simulated radiation sources, said method comprising the steps of: electronically plotting a simulation of the contour of the areas of interest of the patient desired to be treated; selecting a predetermined number of simulated sources of radiation of known beam sizes and wedges and electronically orienting and directing said simulated radiation sources about the patient contour; setting radiation dosage limits at a plurality of points within the patient contour; automatically determining the beam strength for each of the predetermined number of oriented sources of simulated radiation which will result in radiation dosages within the set limits at the points within the patient contour; manually intervening by readjusting certain of the radiation dosage limits in the patient contour should the previous step fail to yield a beam strength dosage distribution resulting in radiation dosages within the initially set limits at the points within the patient contour; automatically redetermining the beam strength for each of the predetermined number of oriented sources of simulated radiation which will result in radiation dosages within the readjusted limits at the points within the patient contour; repeating the preceeding two steps until the radiation dosages fall within the readjusted limits; and displaying the resulting isodose pattern; whereafter radiation therapy to the areas of interest of the patient can be effected with the same oriented and predetermined number of actual radiation sources having the determined beam strengths.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method of treatment planning according to claim 1, wherein said step of automatically determining the beam strength for each of said oriented simulated sources of radiation includes the step of electronically solving a set of simultaneous linear inequalities corresponding in number to the number of said points within said contour.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
77 words
The method of treatment planning according to claim 2, wherein each of said linear inequalities is of the form: α.sub.a1 W.sub.1 + α.sub.a2 W.sub.2 + . . . + α.sub.an W.sub.n R.sub.a wherein n is the number of simulated sources of radiation, R a represents a set dosage limit at point a within said contour, α an equals the attenuation constant from source n to point a, and W n equals the beam strength of source n.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of treatment planning according to claim 3, wherein said set of simultaneous inequalities are solved by means of linear programming techniques wherein the integral radiation dose is minimized as the objective function.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
72 words
The method of treatment planning according to claim 4, wherein said step of automatically redetermining the beam strength for each of said simulated sources of radiation includes the step of electronically solving a set of simultaneous linear inequalities corresponding in number to the number of said points within said contour by means of linear programming techniques wherein the deviation of said radiation dosages from said limits is minimized as the objective function.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein the step of displaying the resulting isodose pattern comprises electronically plotting the isodose pattern superimposed on said contour as a result of the determination of the beam strength for each of said simulated radiation beams.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3871579A
Cited
US3783251A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1979-10-19 | 1980-04-19 | 1980-10-19 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1983-10-19 | 1984-04-19 | 1984-10-19 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1987-10-19 | 1988-04-19 | 1988-10-19 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |