← Back to Patent Explorer
US3947850A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Notch fed electric microstrip dipole antenna

Assignee: United States Department of the Navy
•
Filing: 1975-04-24
•
Granted: 1976-03-30
•
Expires: 1995-04-24
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A notch fed electric microstrip dipole antenna consisting of a thin electrically conducting, rectangular-shaped element formed on one surface of a dielectric substrate, the ground plane being on the opposite surface. The length of the element determines the resonant frequency. The feed point is located in a notch along the centerline of the antenna length and the input impedance can be varied by moving the feed point along the centerline of the antenna without affecting the radiation pattern. Of all the many types of microstrip antennas built to date, this antenna offers the best advantages as far as arraying of the elements are concerned. The notched antenna can be arrayed using microstrip interconnecting transmission lines. The corner losses in the clad material and the width of the notch determines how narrow the element can be made. The purpose of the notch feed system is to interconnect any array of elements at the elements' optimum feed point using microstrip transmission lines.

Inventors

  • 👤 Cyril M. Kaloi

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-22 22:05
CPC Classifications
H; H01; H01Q; H01Q9/00; H01Q9/04; H01Q9/0407

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim 226 words
A notch fed electric microstrip dipole antenna having low physical profile and conformal arraying capability, comprising: a. a thin ground plane conductor; b. a thin rectangular radiation element having a notch extending into said element from one end thereof along the centerline of the element length, said element being spaced from said ground plane; c. said radiating element being electrically separated from said ground plane by a dielectric substrate; d. said radiating element having an optimum feed point located along the centerline of the length thereof at the inner end of said notch; e. said radiating element being fed from a coaxial-to-microstrip adapter, the center pin of said adapter extending through said ground plane and dielectric substrate to the plane of said radiating element; f. the length of said radiating element determining the resonant frequency of said antenna; g. the antenna input impedance being variable to match most practical impedances as said feed point is moved along said centerline without affecting the antenna radiation pattern; h. the antenna bandwidth being variable with the width of the radiating element and the spacing between said radiating element and said ground plane, the width of said notch being a factor as to the effective width of said element, said spacing between the radiating element and the ground plane having somewhat greater effect on the bandwidth than the element width.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 226 words
A notch fed electric microstrip dipole antenna having low physical profile and conformal arraying capability, comprising: a. a thin ground plane conductor; b. a thin rectangular radiation element having a notch extending into said element from one end thereof along the centerline of the element length, said element being spaced from said ground plane; c. said radiating element being electrically separated from said ground plane by a dielectric substrate; d. said radiating element having an optimum feed point located along the centerline of the length thereof at the inner end of said notch; e. said radiating element being fed from a coaxial-to-microstrip adapter, the center pin of said adapter extending through said ground plane and dielectric substrate to the plane of said radiating element; f. the length of said radiating element determining the resonant frequency of said antenna; g. the antenna input impedance being variable to match most practical impedances as said feed point is moved along said centerline without affecting the antenna radiation pattern; h. the antenna bandwidth being variable with the width of the radiating element and the spacing between said radiating element and said ground plane, the width of said notch being a factor as to the effective width of said element, said spacing between the radiating element and the ground plane having somewhat greater effect on the bandwidth than the element width.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 28 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein the ground plane conductor extends at least one wavelength beyond each edge of the element to minimize any possible backlobe radiation.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 40 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein said thin rectangular radiation element is in the form of a square, said square element being the limit as to how wide the element can be without exciting higher order modes of radiation.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 26 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein a plurality of said radiating elements are arrayed with microstrip transmission lines to provide a near isotropic radiation pattern.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 17 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein the length of said radiating element is approximately 1/2 wavelength.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 20 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein said antenna element feed point is connected directly to said adapter center pin.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 26 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein said antenna element optimum feed point is connected to said adpater center pin by means of microstrip transmission line.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 21 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein said thin rectangular radiating element is formed on one surface of said dielectric substrate.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 98 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein the length of the antenna radiating element is determined by the equation: A = [1.18 × 10.sup.10 - F × 4 × H × √ε]/[2 × F × √1 + 0.61 × (ε - 1) × (B-S/H).sup.0.1155 ] where A is the length to be determined F = the center frequency (Hz) B = the width of the antenna element H = the thickness of the dielectric ε = the dielectric constant of the substrate S = the width of the notch B-s = the effective width of the antenna element.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 240 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein the radiation patterns are power patterns, |E.sub.θ| 2 and |E.sub.φ| 2 , polarization field E.sub.φ and the field normal to the polarization field E.sub.θ, and are given by the equations: ##EQU13## and ##EQU14## where U = (U2 - U3)/U5 t = (t3 - t4/t8 u2 32 p sin (A × P/2) cos (k × A × sin θ sin φ/2) U3 = k sin θ sin φ cos (A × P/2) sin (k × A × sin θ sin φ/2) U5 = (P 2 - k 2 sin.sup. 2 θ sin 2 φ) T3 = P sin (P × B/2) cos (k × B × cos θ/2) T4 = k cos θ cos (P × B/2) sin (k × B × cos θ/2) T8 = (P 2 - K 2 cos 2 θ) I m = maximum current (amps) P = 2π/λ g , k = 2π/λ λ = free space wave length (inches) λ g = waveguide wavelength (inches) and λ g ≈ 2 × A + (4 × H/√ε) r = the range between the antenna and an arbitrary point in space (inches) Z o = characteristic impedance of the element (ohms) and Z o is given by ##EQU15## H = the thickness of the dielectric B = the width of the antenna element S = the width of the notch ε = the dielectric constant of the substrate (no units).
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 30 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein the minimum width of said radiating element is determined by the equivalent internal resistance of the conductor plus any loss due the dielectric.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 54 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein the input impedance, R in , is given by the equation ##EQU16## where R a the radiation resistance 2R c = the total internal resistance Z o = characteristic impedance of the element, and y o = distance of feed point from the center of the element.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

FR1050583A Cited
US3810183A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1979-03-30 1979-09-29 1980-03-30 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1983-03-30 1983-09-29 1984-03-30 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1987-03-30 1987-09-29 1988-03-30 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag